The objective of the present work was to test the application of multicriteria methods for prioritizing the technical activities of the cartography sector of a military institution that produces geoinformation, aiming at increasing efficiency in productive operations and in the effective allocation of available resources. In this attempt, the multicriteria decision support methods AHP, AHP-Gaussian and AHP-TOPSIS-2N were used. In 75% of the scenarios tested, the priority alternative was A2 (Cartographic Mapping of Force Interest). In all methods, the two alternatives with the lowest priority were A6 (Survey of Heritage Areas) and A3 (COTER Simulation). The sensitivity analysis and consultation with the specialist regarding his opinion on the results obtained, allow us to state that the methods are consistent and corroborate with the expectations of the specialist who acted in the decision-making process for the prioritization of the activities in question.

The objective of the present work is to evidence the usefulness of the multicriteria methods in the prioritization of resources in the production of cartographic information. For this, a systematic review of the literature in scientific databases was carried out in the period from 2007 to 2022. Concepts and procedures related to the characterization of scientific production on prioritization and multicriteria decision support methods were observed in the literature, examining the contributions of different countries, journals, authors and research trends. The analysis of the works showed a significant preponderance of the AHP and MCDA-C multicriteria methods.

O objetivo do presente trabalho é evidenciar a utilidade dos métodos multicritério na priorização de recursos na produção de informações cartográficas. Para tal foi realizada uma revisão sistemática da literatura em bases de dados científicas no período de 2007 a 2022. Foram observados na literatura conceitos e procedimentos relacionados a caracterização da produção científica sobre priorização e métodos de apoio multicritério à decisão, examinando as contribuições de diferentes países, periódicos, autores e tendências de pesquisas. A análise dos trabalhos demonstrou uma significativa preponderância dos métodos multicritério AHP e MCDA-C.