To evaluate 20 different automated biopsy devices with respect to the quality of tissue obtained for histopathologic analysis, a total of 1,470 18-gauge biopsy specimens were obtained from 10 fresh autopsy cases, including 30 liver, 20 kidney, 10 pancreas, and 10 psoas muscle biopsy specimens per device and per biopsy depth. There was no statistical difference in the performance of the long-throw Biopty, ASAP 18, 1.9-cm UltraCut, long-throw Monopty, and 2.5-cm ABS biopsy guns. All obtained a large amount of tissue with minimal fragmentation or crush artifact. Most of the short-throw biopsy guns (depth of biopsy < or = 1.1 cm) did not perform as well. Although the other guns performed adequately, less than optimal results were obtained with the Temno, Bio-Gun, Roth, Klear Kut, ABC, and Urocut biopsy guns. Most 18-gauge automated biopsy devices with a biopsy excursion of at least 2.0 cm provide a high-quality, diagnostically adequate specimen for histopathologic analysis.

No abstract

The present case suggests that although various anti-rejection therapies and opportunistic infections are associated with hepatic and renal dysfunction along with bone marrow suppression, the diagnostic evaluation in this situation should include liver biopsy and a careful search for evidence of systemic Bartonella infection, e.g., exposure to cats, Bartonella serology, and Bartonella DNA by PCR. A reduction in immunosuppression and prolonged therapy with antibiotics such as erythromycin will often result in early recovery.

The performances of seven techniques and devices used with 22-gauge needles to obtain biopsy specimens for cytologic analysis were compared by means of single-blinded evaluation with an objective, previously published grading scheme. A total of 420 specimens were obtained from 10 fresh human cadavers (42 specimens per cadaver), including 30 hepatic, 20 renal, and 10 pancreatic specimens per technique or device. No statistical differences existed in the liver, kidney, or pancreas or in the combined data in the performance of the aspirator gun, syringe holders, vacuum needle, and end-cut gun versus the manual aspiration biopsy technique performed with a 22-gauge Chiba needle. However, nonaspiration, fine-needle capillary biopsy (FNCB) performed statistically significantly worse than any other technique or device in the kidney and pancreas and in comparison with the overall combined data. In the liver, no statistically significant difference existed in the overall performance of FNCB versus conventional aspiration biopsy, but the amount of cellular material obtained with FNCB was statistically significantly less.

We sought to determine whether the variability in dysplasia rates in cases of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) reflects variability in interpretation of cervical biopsy specimens. In phase 1, 124 biopsy specimens obtained because of a cytologic diagnosis of ASCUS were reviewed independently by 5 experienced pathologists. Diagnostic choices were normal, squamous metaplasia, reactive, indeterminate, low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL), and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL). The rate of dysplasia ranged from 23% to 51%. All pathologists agreed in 28% of cases. In 52% of cases, the diagnoses ranged from benign to dysplasia. The overall interobserver agreement was poor. In phase 2, 60 cervical biopsy specimens (21 obtained for ASCUS, 22 for LSIL, and 17 for HSIL) were evaluated using the same diagnostic choices. Agreement was better in biopsies performed for HSIL and LSIL compared to those for ASCUS. Intraobserver reproducibility in the interpretation of biopsies performed for ASCUS ranged from poor to excellent. We conclude that variability in the interpretation of biopsy specimens plays an important role in the differences in rates of dysplasia reported for the follow-up of ASCUS.