Background:Among the chronic rheumatic diseases, hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA) is the most prevalent and is a leading cause of pain and disability in most countries worldwide. Its prevalence increases with age and generally affects women more frequently than men. OA is strongly associated with aging and heavy physical occupational activity, a required livelihood for many people living in rural communities in developing countries. Determining region-specific OA prevalence and risk factor profiles will provide important information for planning future cost effective preventive strategies and health care services.Materials and Methods:The study was a community based cross sectional study to find out the prevalence of primary knee OA in India which has a population of 1.252 billion. The study was done across five sites in India. Each site was further divided into big city, small city, town, and village. The total sample size was 5000 subjects. Tools consisted of a structured questionnaire and plain skiagrams for confirmation of OA. Diagnosis was done using Kellgren and Lawrence scale for osteoarthritis.Results:Overall prevalence of knee OA was found to be 28.7%. The associated factors were found to be female gender (prevalence of 31.6%) (P = 0.007), obesity (P = 0.04), age (P = 0.001) and sedentary work (P = 0.001).Conclusions:There is scarcity of studies done in India which has varied socio geographical background and communities. We conducted this study for analyzing the current prevalence of OA in different locations. This study has evidenced a large percentage of population as borderline OA; therefore, it depends mainly on the prevention of modifiable risk factors to preserve at ease movement in elderly population through awareness programs.

The great toe extension test was the best screening tool. The FPI was a good tool for diagnosing and grading of flatfoot and evaluating treatment progress. Combining foot exercises and foot wear modifications achieved the best outcome.

Purpose. To review the outcomes of fixation with cancellous screws and fibular strut grafts for neglected femoral neck fractures. Methods. 44 men and 28 women aged 17 to 50 years with neglected femoral neck fractures of the subcapital (n=12), transcervical (n=57), or basal (n=3) types underwent closed (n=39) or open (n=33) reduction and fixation with a single cancellous screw with double fibular strut grafts (n=24) or fixation with double cancellous screws with a single fibular strut graft (n=48). The mean time from injury to surgery was 10 weeks; the delay was 22 to 35 days in 43 patients and >35 days in 29 patients. Double fibular strut grafts were used for 18 patients with longer delay and resorption of the femoral neck, and 18 patients with posterior comminution of the femoral neck. The outcome was assessed using the Harris hip score. Results. Patients were followed up for a mean of 3 years. The time to bone union was 3 to 4 months in Fixation with cancellous screws and fibular strut grafts for neglected femoral neck fractures

Introduction: Osteoarthritis knee is one of the most prevalent conditions of knee in elder age group of population. Its causes pain, disability in geriatric population of society. Longer life expectancy is responsible for increase in osteoarthritis knee. K-L scale is well known scale of radiographic OA knee. This study was done to find prevalence of OA knee in Indian population of older than 40 years using K-L scale. Method: The study was a community based cross sectional study. The target population was from 5 metropolis, 5 cities near the metropolis, 5 towns and 20 villages from blocks of these towns. i.e. 5 sample groups were covered. Sample size n ¼ 4680 which was further divided into 5 sites equally (936 from each site). This was rounded to a sample of 1000 from each site. This evaluation study was conducted using the household as the primary sampling unit for the quantitative survey. The respondents for the study were above 40 years. Quantitative data was collected using structured questionnaire and X-Ray Investigation. OA was graded using the Kellgren and Lawrence scale. Data analysis was performed using SPSS statistical software. Frequencies and percentages were calculated to find the prevalence of OA. Chi-Square test was used to find the association of OA with various factors. Results: The present study shows a prevalence of 28.7% of OA in the overall sample. This varies slightly in the individual states e Agra (35.5%), Bangalore (26.6%), Kolkata (33.7%), Dehradun (27.2%), and Pune (21.7%).OA prevalence was found to be more in participants who used western toilet (42.1%), in sedentary people (82.9%), in females and in obese. Conclusion:This study has evidenced that there is a large percentage of sub-threshold population. i.e. K-L grade 1 which is considered as border-line or doubt-full as far as OA diagnosis. Awareness of OA should be initiated at community level, which is needed for prevention of OA at early age.

a b s t r a c tPurpose: Ilizarov ring fixator and limb reconstruction system (LRS) fixators have been used in the management of complex tibial fractures with severe soft tissue injuries, compound tibial fractures, and infected tibial nonunion for which conventional internal fixation cannot be contemplated. Fracture union and distraction osteogenesis can be done simultaneously with these external fixators, allowing early weight bearing. Several previous studies have shown almost equal results of rail and ring fixators for the compound tibial shaft fractures. Thus we performed a prospective study to evaluate the union rate, functional outcome and amount of limb lengthening after the treatment of compound tibial shaft fractures with or without infected nonunion by ring or LRS fixators. Methods: This prospective study was done at Sarojini Naidu Medical College and Hospital, Agra, India and included 32 patients of compound tibial shaft fractures with or without infected nonunion. There were 26 males and 6 females and the average age was 40 years. Patients were randomly divided into two groups (n ¼ 16 for each): one underwent Ilizarov fixation and the other received LRS fixation. Cases were followed up for 3e24 months, 6 months on average from September 2012 to October 2014. Functional and radiological outcomes were assessed using the Association for the Study and Application of Methods of Ilizarov (ASAMI) criteria for both rail and ring fixators. Results: Union was achieved in all cases. Radiological outcome was found excellent in 68.75%, good in 18.75% and fair in 12.50% of cases treated by rail fixators whereas it was excellent in 56.25%, good in 18.75%, fair in 12.50% and poor in 12.50% of cases treated by ring fixators. Functional result was satisfactory in 75.00% of cases treated by rail fixator and 68.75% of cases treated by ring fixators whereas the corresponding rate of unsatisfactory was 25.00% vs. 31.25%. Conclusion: In our short-term assessment, LRS fixators show a better result than Ilizarov fixators in terms of fracture union and functional outcome with soft tissue care and limb length.