Neurologic impairments are usually irreversible as a result of limited regeneration in the central nervous system. Therefore, based on the regenerative capacity of stem cells, transplantation therapies of various stem cells have been tested in basic research and preclinical trials, and some have shown great prospects. This manuscript overviews the cellular and molecular characteristics of embryonic stem cells, induced pluripotent stem cells, neural stem cells, retinal stem/progenitor cells, mesenchymal stem/stromal cells, and their derivatives in vivo and in vitro as sources for regenerative therapy. These cells have all been considered as candidates to treat several major neurological disorders and diseases, owing to their self-renewal capacity, multi-directional differentiation, neurotrophic properties, and immune modulation effects. We also review representative basic research and recent clinical trials using stem cells for neurodegenerative diseases, including Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, and age-related macular degeneration, as well as traumatic brain injury and glioblastoma. In spite of a few unsuccessful cases, risks of tumorigenicity, and ethical concerns, most results of animal experiments and clinical trials demonstrate efficacious therapeutic effects of stem cells in the treatment of nervous system disease. In summary, these emerging findings in regenerative medicine are likely to contribute to breakthroughs in the treatment of neurological disorders. Thus, stem cells are a promising candidate for the treatment of nervous system diseases.

To compare the antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment patterns, seizure control, and folic acid supplementation between planned and unplanned pregnancy in women with epilepsy (WWE) and to investigate the effects of planned pregnancy on fetal outcomes. Methods: A prospectively collected database including WWE with pregnancy from Feb 2010 to Dec 2018 was retrospectively analyzed. Planned pregnancy was defined as WWE being regularly supervised by epileptologists from the time of intended pregnancy until delivery. Clinical characteristics and fetal outcomes were compared between the planned and unplanned pregnancy groups. Logistic regression was used to identify modifiable factors associated with adverse fetal outcomes. Results: A total of 188 planned pregnancies and 289 unplanned pregnancies were enrolled in our study. Among planned pregnancies, 66.0 % took AED monotherapy, and 32.4 % received polytherapy. Among unplanned pregnancies, 58.1 % didn't take AEDs, 28.0 % took monotherapy, and 12.8 % received polytherapy. The planned pregnancies had less generalized tonic-clonic seizures (P = 0.002) and higher proportion of being seizure-free (41.0 % vs. 22.8 %; P < 0.001). All planned pregnancies took folic acid while 39.8 % of unplanned pregnancies never took it (P < 0.001). The planned pregnancies had less rates of induced abortions (2.7 % vs. 13.5 %; P < 0.001), preterm births (3.3 % vs. 20.4 %; P < 0.001), and major congenital malformations (1.6 % vs. 7.5 %; P = 0.016). Pregnancy planning was independently associated with adverse fetal outcomes (adjusted OR, 0.14; 95 % CI, 0.08−0.27; P < 0.001). Conclusion:Planned pregnancy in WWE contributes to more optimized AED pattern, better seizure control, more appropriate folic acid supplementation, and less adverse fetal outcomes.

No abstract

No abstract