Background
Trichorhinophalangeal syndrome type 1 (TRPS1) is a novel immunohistochemical marker with excellent performance in distinguishing breast carcinoma from other cancers in surgical specimens. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic utility of TRPS1 compared with GATA3 for metastatic breast carcinoma in effusion cytology specimens.
Methods
In total, 91 cell blocks of malignant effusion specimens, including 47 metastatic breast carcinomas (nine triple‐negative breast carcinomas [TNBCs] and 38 non‐TNBCs) and 44 nonmammary malignancies, were selected for TRPS1 and GATA3 immunohistochemistry. Modified H scores ≥ 200 were considered positive staining.
Results
The positive rate of TRPS1 was similar between TNBC and non‐TNBC (77.8% vs 73.3%, p = .802), whereas the positive rate of GATA3 was lower in TNBC than in non‐TNBC (66.7% vs 89.5%, p = .087). The positive rate of TRPS1 was significantly higher in breast carcinoma than in urothelial carcinoma (74.5% vs 0%, p < .001), whereas the positive rate of GATA3 showed no difference between these two (85.1% vs 85.7%, p = .956). Notably, diffuse and strong aberrant expression of TRPS1 was observed in one lung adenocarcinoma and one serous adenocarcinoma in this series. The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of TRPS1 immunohistochemistry for breast carcinoma were 74.5%, 95.5%, 94.6%, and 77.8%, respectively.
Conclusion
TRPS1 is a sensitive and specific marker for metastatic breast cancer in serous effusion cell‐block specimens. It shows superior sensitivity and specificity compared with GATA3, especially in the TNBC setting and for excluding urothelial carcinoma.
Background:
To assess the clinical outcomes and metastatic behavior between de novo versus recurrent human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) based on a single-institution database in Taiwan.
Methods:
We retrospectively identified patients diagnosed between January 2000 and December 2017 with de novo stage IV or recurrent HER2-positive MBC. Several variables were recorded in patients with recurrent disease: age at diagnosis, metastatic site, hormone receptor (HR) status, HER2 status, and disease-free interval (DFI). Treatments and metastatic patterns were compared between de novo stage IV and recurrent MBC cohorts. Post-metastasis survival (PMS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank tests. Hazard ratios and 95% CIs were estimated using Cox regression analysis.
Results:
In total, 1360 patients were diagnosed with breast cancer with HER2 overexpression. At baseline, de novo stage IV patients were older than recurrent MBC patients (median age 58 vs 53). The majority of the de novo stage IV patients were diagnosed after 2010, while most of the recurrent MBC patients were diagnosed during 2000-2009. An increased number of de novo stage IV patients underwent targeted therapy than recurrent MBC patients was also noted. PMS in patients with de novo stage IV and recurrent MBC was 79.2 months and 61.8 months, respectively, which indicated significant better survival in de novo stage IV than those with recurrent MBC disease. Longer survival was also noted in de novo stage IV and recurrent MBC with DFI >24 months than in those with recurrent MBC with DFI <24 months and in patients receiving HER2-targeted therapy after MBC diagnosis than in those not receiving the therapy. However, median PMS showed no significant difference between patients with the luminal B2 (HR-positive, HER2-negative) and HER2-enriched (HR-negative, HER2-positive) subtypes. After adjustment in multivariate analysis, a low risk of BC-specific death was observed in patients aged >50 years, those receiving HER2-targeted therapy for MBC, and those with oligometastasis, while patients with first metastases to the liver or brain showed a higher risk of BC-specific death than those without metastases.
Conclusion:
De novo and recurrent MBC have distinct characteristic, metastatic patterns and outcomes in Asian HER2-positive breast cancer patients. The age distribution and survivals between HR+/– status were different to non-Asian group. These differences should be further investigated in the future considering ethnic factor.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.