No abstract

e22517 Background: there are few reported series n women with breast cancer (BC) and COVID-19, a better prognosis has been observed, with a lower rate of hospitalization and mortality than other neoplasms. Methods: We conducted a restrospective, non-experimental, observational, single center, study with a sample of 69 patients with BC who had presented COVID-19, in the period between March 2020 to August 2021. Clinicopathological characteristics of patients with BC were compared between severe and non-severe covid 19 groups, as well as hospitalized and non-hospitalized patients. An analysis of possible risk factors associated with severe disease and hospitalization was performed. Results: 69 cases were reported, median age 52y, mean BMI 25.2, ECOG 0-1: 97%. Smoking history in 24%, diabetes and hypertension were the most frequent comorbidities. The most frequent histology was ductal carcinoma in 80.6%, 73.8% showed ER + and 69.3% PR +, HER2 was overexpressed in 9.2%. The early stages predominated, I 22 (31.3%), II 25 (37.3%), III in 12 (17.9%) and IV in 6 (9%). The most frequents symptoms of COVID-19 were fatigue 70.1%, fever 65.7%, cough 59.7%, headache 56.7%, hyposmia 47.8%, dysgeusia 38.8%. A total of 53 (76.8%) mild cases, 14 (20.3) severe cases and 2 (2.9%) critical cases were registered. The 89.9% (62 patients) were treated as an outpatient basis, while 7 (10.1%) required hospitalization. Active treatment (< 45 days) at the time of COVID-19 was hormonal therapy 36 (50.7%), chemotherapy 11 (16.4%), anti-HER2 in 3 (4.5%), immunotherapy in 1.5%, targeted treatment in 4 (6.0%), surgery in 7 (10.4%) and radiotherapy in 1 (1.5%) patient. When comparing the severe and non-severe groups, as well as hospitalized versus non-hospitalized, we observed no difference between the clinicopathological characteristics. Then, we serch for possible risk factors, in wich, surgery in a period of less than 3 months increases the risk of severity OR 1,297 (95% CI 1,112-1,514), the risk of hospitalization increased in the triple negative subgroup OR 1,143 (95% CI, 1,035- 1,262), surgery less than 3 months OR 1,116 (1,014-1,229) and chemotherapy less than 45 days OR 1,217 (95% CI, 1,024-1,447). Conclusions: In patients with BC, the prevalence of severe or critical COVID-19 was 23% and the hospitalizacion rate 10%. No patient died from this infection. The clinical and pathological characteristics of BC do not appear to increase the risk of severe COVID-19 or the rate of hospitalization. Surgery performed in a period of less than 3 months is marginally associated with an increased risk of severe disease. Chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy do not modify the risk of severe disease; however, higher Ki 67, triple negative subgroup, surgery and chemotherapy showed a slight increase in risk of hospitalization.

e21522 Background: Immune-related adverse effects (irAE´s) of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been linked with a better treatment response in melanoma patients, especially cutaneous toxicities. However, little is known regarding other irAE´s which is important as they can be used as clinical markers of an adequate therapeutical response. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study on patients who were diagnosed with melanoma and received treatment with ICI´s between January 2015 until December 2021, immune related adverse events and their relationship with overall survival in melanoma patients treated with ICIs was the main objective of this study. Results: 53 records of patients with advance melanoma treated with ICIs between january 2016 to december 2021, demographic characteristics were as follow: 64.2% were male, mean age at diagnoses was 60.3 years, 41.5% had smoking history and 15.1% were Jewish. At diagnosis 73.6% of patients had a good functional status (ECOG 0-1). The most common histological subtypes were epithelioid (34%), and nodular (22.6%). Lung metastases was the most common affected site (49.1%), followed by brain 43.4% and non-regional nodes 42.5%. BRAF mutations was determined in 81.1% of the biopsies and 36% of them being V600E mutation. ICI´s was the preferred first line treatment in 83% of cases, median number of administered cycles were 6 (range 1-54 cycles), 60.4% of patients received pembrolizumab, 37.7% nivolumab plus ipilimumab, 20.8% nivolumab monotherapy and 5.7% ipilimumab. Throughout the studied period IrAE´s were reported in 34% of patients with 66.7% of them being grade 1-2 and 33.3% grade 3-4. The most common IrAE’s: vitiligo 38.8%, hypothyroidism22% and 3.8% pneumonitis. Median PFS at 12 months and OS was significantly better in the group of patients with irAE´s: Patients who develop an irAE´s are 7 times more likely to be disease free at 12 months and 4.1 times more likely to have a longer OS regardless of severity and type of toxicity. The impact of developing irAEs is significantly important for PFS (HR: 11.9, CI 95%: 3.28-4.71) as median PFS was not yet reached in this group. Conclusions: Development of irAEs is associated with favorable outcomes to ICIs with patients being 7 times more likely to be 12-month disease free and 4.1 times more likely to have a longer OS. irAEs can be used as clinical markers of an adequate treatment response.[Table: see text]

No abstract

e13053 Background: Breast cancer was the second most common malignant tumor diagnosed in 2018 worldwide, and the main cause of cancer death in women. In Mexico is the leading cause of cancer deaths, the most common molecular subtypes is HR+/HER2- (63%). The addition of iCDK 4/6 can enhance the benefit seen with endocrine therapy (ET) alone. In this work we will describe the experience in a “real world” model, of two tertiary-level hospitals in Mexico, with the use of iCDK 4/6 in a period of 3 years. Methods: Retrospective review of medical records of all consecutive pts with histological diagnosis of metastatic breast cancer HR+/HER2- and iCDK 4/6 treatment at our Institutions from July 2016 to January 2019. Clinical and pathological variables at diagnosis were recorded. Progression free survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and survival distributions were compared using the Log-rank test. To assess association variables and progression we use Chi square. Results: 65 pts were treated, all with iCDK 4/6 in combination with ET, either aromatase inhibitor or irreversible estrogen receptor antagonist. 62 with palbociclib and 3 with ribociclib; Median age was 53 y/o (IQR 42-63), ECOG 0-1 (92.3%), 80% was metastatic recurrent disease, 92% of these patients received endocrine adjuvant treatment. Median estrogen receptor percentage was 90 (IQR 61-92), progesterone 50 (9-83), KI67 20 (10-30). The metastatic sites were bone (64.6%), liver (41.5%), nodal (33.8%), lung (21.5%), CNS (3.1%) and others (18.5%). 26 pts (40%) received iCDK 4/6 in the first line, 21 (32.3%) in the second line, and 27% in subsequent lines. Any grade of toxicity was presented in 44 pts (67.7%), Most common toxicities were neutropenia (63%), fatigue (16.9%), anemia (9.2%), grade 3-4 toxicities were presented in 21.5% and 17 pts (26.2%) required any dose adjustment. At the cut-off date, 28 pts (43.1%) had disease progression, median time to progression for the 65 pts was 10 months (1-84). OR for first line treatment vs subsequent lines was 0.14 (0.04-0.47, 95%, p = 0.001). OR for pulmonary metastases were 4.21 (1.15-15.31, 95%, p = 0.03), for other sites of metastasis were NS. Conclusions: Our outcomes suggest that the PFS is better when iCDK 4/6 are used as a first line treatment. Pulmonary metastases are may associated with poorly outcomes. In low- and middle-income countries, efforts should be focused on early therapy with iCDK 4/6.