No abstract

Objective A database with reference values of the durations of the various waveforms in a magnetocardiogram of fetuses in uncomplicated pregnancies is assessed. This database will be of help to discriminate between pathologic and healthy fetuses. A fetal magnetocardiogram is a recording of the magnetic field in a location near the maternal abdomen and reflects the electric activity within the fetal heart. It is a non-invasive method, which can be used with nearly 100% reliability from the 20th week of gestation onward. Design Durations of the waveforms were assembled from averaged magnetocardiograms and statistically processed. Setting Fetal magnetocardiograms were measured with different magnetocardiographs. All measurements were carried out in magnetically shielded rooms. Sample Fetal magnetocardiograms were obtained for 582 healthy patients.Method The durations of the waveforms were extracted from fetal magnetocardiograms measured at the cooperating centres. The variables collected included the duration of the P-wave, the PR interval, the PQ interval, the QRS complex, the QT interval and the T-wave and QTc value. The results were compared with values extracted from electrocardiograms of fetuses measured via electrodes attached to the maternal abdomen, from electrocardiograms measured during labour using a scalp electrode, and from electrocardiograms recorded in newborns, that were found in the literature. Main outcome measures Values of the durations are given as a function of gestational age including the regression line as well as the bounds marking the 90%, 95% and 98% prediction interval. Results The durations of the P-wave, the PR interval, the QRS complex, the QT interval and QTc value increase linearly with gestational age. The durations of the PQ interval and the T-wave are independent of fetal age. Conclusion The values found agree with those found in the literature. The scatter of the data is wide due to the variation in normal physiology, the measuring system and signal processing and the subjectivity of the researcher. However, the system can define normal ranges and may be used in diagnosis.

No abstract

Gynecological sonography is the central and most frequently used technical examination method used by gynecologists. Its focus is on the clarification of masses of the uterus and the adnexa, fertility diagnosis, clarification of bleeding disorders and chronic and acute pelvic problems, pelvic floor and incontinence diagnosis as well as the differential diagnosis of disturbed early pregnancy. The indication for diagnostic and therapeutic interventions, preoperative planning and postoperative controls are largely based on the findings of gynecological sonography. These examinations are particularly dependent on the experience of the examiner.Based on the proven multi-stage concept of obstetric diagnostics, gynecological sonography should primarily be performed by an experienced and specialized examiner in patients for whom the initial gynecological examinations have not yet led to a sufficient assessment of the findings. So that the expert status required for this has an objective basis, the Gynecology and Obstetrics Section of DEGUM in cooperation with ÖGUM and SGUM implemented the option of acquiring DEGUM Level II for gynecological sonography. The effectiveness of the care in the multi-level concept depends on the quality of the ultrasound examination at level I. Quality requirements for the basic examination and the differentiation between the basic and further examination have therefore already been defined by DEGUM/ÖGUM. The present work is intended to set out quality requirements for gynecological sonography of DEGUM level II and for the correspondingly certified gynecologists.Common pathologies from gynecological sonography and requirements for imaging and documentation are described.

Expert pattern recognition was found to be the method with the highest discriminative power in assessing an adnexal mass during premenopause. Additional assessment of serum CA 125 diminished the diagnostic accuracy. Standardized morphological sonographic assessment resulted in a moderate diagnostic accuracy. Supplementing the morphological sonographic assessment with CA 125 by using the RMI algorithm did not improve the diagnostic value.