Cassava is a key food security crop in Central Africa, but its production depends largely on the use of local farmers’ varieties characterized by inherently low yield which is compounded by generally high susceptibility to various growth and yield-limiting pests and diseases. Improved cassava genotypes have demonstrated the potential to substantially improve cassava’s contribution to food security and the development of the cassava industry and the improvement of nutrition status elsewhere in Western Africa. Eleven improved cassava genotypes were compared with a local landrace (LMR) used as a check under field conditions over two years in eight locations, grouped in four agro-ecologies in Cameroon. Pest and disease abundance/incidence and damage severity were evaluated. At harvest, root yield and carotenoid content were measured. Best linear unbiased predictors showed the lowest breeding value for LMR with the cassava mosaic virus disease (+ 66.40 ± 2.42) compared with 1.00 ± 0.02% for the most susceptible improved genotype. Two genotypes (I010040-27 and I011797) stood out for having higher predicted fresh root yield means which were at least 16 times greater compared with LMR. Predicted total carotenoid content was the highest (+ 5.04 ± 0.17) for improved genotype I070593 compared with LMR which showed the lowest (− 3.90 ± 0.06%) and could contribute to the alleviation of vitamin A deficiency from cassava-based food systems. Diffusion of high-yielding and nutritious genotypes could alleviate food and nutritional security in Central Africa.
Introduction: The promotion of fruit tree farming for household or industrial purpose constitutes one of the priorities of agricultural research and development in Cameroon. However, the lack of reliable statistics, leads to underestimation of fruit value especially in semi-arid areas affected by recurrent environmental stress and food insecurity. This limits the prospects of development of fruit resources and justifies the initiation of this study aimed to assess the biodiversity and food value of fruit available in (North) Cameroon. Methodology and Results A literature review coupled with interviews involving resourceful persons and direct observations helped to classify the fruit biodiversity nature at the Institute of Agricultural Research for Development (IRAD) and to characterize sales in seven markets of Garoua (Benoue Division, North Region). Fruit sampling was conducted at these markets during the rainy season (July to September) and their physicosensory characteristics and commercial value assessed. It appears that the fruit conservatory unit of IRAD Garoua harbors principally 17 citrus fruit species (122 varieties) and 71 varieties of mango (308 trees in totals). At Garoua, market 21 fruits were classified with eight fruits dominating the sales: avocados, banana, orange, Shea fruit, mango, tamarind, baobab, and lemon. Their botanical identity was revealed and the examination of their physico-sensory properties and commercial value confirms the extent of biodiversity but also their affordability through prices ranging from 10 to 1,300 CFA / fruit. Conclusion and application: In view of the many advantages of fruits, it is proposed to extend the observations to other periods and climatic zones. This should contribute to a better knowledge of the supply and fruit consumption in (North) Cameroon. Due to their high nutrient value, the consumption of these fruits and products is strongly encouraged for a healthy nutrition in savannah areas in prey of micronutrient deficiencies. Valorization approaches through local processing need to be explored for a better preservation of fruit diversity.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.