Introduction: Conventional Pap Smear (CPS) technique has been the mainstay for early detection of cervical cancer. However, its extensive use has not been possible due to the limitations, like presence of obscuring blood and inflammation, reducing its sensitivity markedly. False negativity of CPS is also very high so Liquid Based Cytology (LBC) was introduced. Aim: To compare cytomorphological patterns, diagnostic utility and adequacy of smears of cervical lesions on CPS and LBC. Materials and Methods: This study was a Prospective descriptive study, conducted in Department of Pathology of Dr. B R Ambedkar Medical College and Hospital, Bangalore for 19 months during November 2018 to May 2020 on 250 cases. The samples were taken with cervix-brush. First, a CPS was prepared and was immediately alcohol-fixed. After that same brush head was rinsed in LBC vial containing methanol. Statistical analysis was done using Statistical Package for Social Sciences 22.0 (SPSS) and R environment 3.2.2 for data analysis. Results: Most of the patients were in the fourth decade of life and 160 cases (64%) presented as white discharge per vaginum. Total 231 (92.4%) smears were satisfactory on CPS and 233 (93.2%) smears on LBC. The number of Low grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions (LSIL) increased from 4 cases (1.6%) in CPS to 6 cases (2.4%) in LBC in this study. Rate of detection of High grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion (HSIL) was more with LBC (11 cases, 4.4%) compared to that of CPS (7 cases, 2.8%). It was seen that in this study, sensitivity and specificity of LBC is better than CP in detecting LSIL and HSIL, but except specificity of CP was more than LBC in detecting LSIL. Present study showed overall sensitivity of 77.1% in CP and 94.3% in LBC and specificity of 97.2% and 100% in CP and LBC, respectively. The p-value calculated was <0.001 which was highly significant. Conclusion: The LBC technique showed clear background, well preserved cytomorphological details, removal of extra mucus, blood and inflammatory cell infiltrate as compared to CPS technique. Atypical cells or abnormal cells were seen better and were detected more by LBC as compared to CPS.
Introduction: Majority of nasal and paranasal sinus lesions clinically present as polypoidal lesions, complicating the diagnosis for the physician which inturn hampers the patient prognosis and in few cases survival of patient, so histopathology is imperative to arrive at the diagnosis. Carcinoma of the paranasal sinus cavity is rare representing 3-4% of head and neck tumours and less than 1% of all malignancies. Aim: To examine the histopathological patterns of neoplastic nasal and paranasal sinus lesions, to categorise neoplastic lesions into benign and malignant types, to find the relation of these lesions with age and sex and also to find the utility of Immunohistochemistry (IHC) in differentiating morphologically suspicious lesions. Materials and Methods: The present cross-sectional study was carried out between January 2020-January 2021. A total of 22 cases were taken for the study, which were received as nasal and paranasal sinus lesions in histopathology. All the lesions received were processed according to standard protocol and diagnosed histopathologically and confirmed by relevant special stains and immunohistochemical analysis (CD99, CD56 etc.). Results: Out of 22 cases, 16 were benign and six were malignant. The lesions were commonly detected between fourth to sixth decades. Male to female ratio was 1.4:1. The ratio of benign to malignant lesion was 2.67:1. The most common benign lesion encountered was capillary haemangioma (seven cases) and malignant lesion seen was squamous cell carcinoma (three cases), comparable to other similar studies. The IHC was done in malignant lesions for accurate diagnosis. Conclusion: In the present study, the cases are divided into benign and malignant lesions with the help of histopathological examination. Cases showing features of malignancy were further subjected to immunohistochemical examination as to diagnose the cases precisely and thus help in patient treatment and prognosis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.