This article updates our previous review of Ki67 published in Histopathology 10 years ago. In this period the numbers of papers published featuring this antibody has increased 10-fold from 338 to 3489 indicating the considerable enthusiasm with which this antibody has been studied. This review attempts to provide an update on the characterization of the Ki67 protein, its function and its use as a prognostic or diagnostic tool.

Monoclonal antibody Ki-67 is a reliable and easy means of accurately assessing the growth fraction of human neoplasms. Although the number of long-term follow-up studies is limited, it does appear to provide valuable prognostic information particularly in lymphoproliferative disease. Since the estimation of growth fraction is only one factor influencing tumour behaviour it would be naive to believe that measurement of this parameter alone, no matter how accurately, would provide the clinician with definitive prognostic information for all tumours. The antibody is also of use in research, providing a means of measuring proliferative activity in a variety of conditions besides malignancy, and may prove of value in monitoring tumour response to established and trial therapies.

For routine use, MIB1 or polyclonal Ki67 are the best proliferation markers in conventional histological preparations. The other markers tested cannot be recommended.

1 The ability of angiotensin II to modulate dopamine release from rat striatal slices in vitro and in the intact rat striatum in vivo was assessed by the microdialysis technique.2 In slices of rat striatum, angiotensin II (0.1-1.0 gM) induced a concentration-related increase in endogenous dopamine release which was maximal (approximately 250% above basal levels) within the first 2-4 min of agonist application and subsequently declined to near

The expression of cytokeratin intermediate filaments by a tumour has been accepted as evidence of an epithelial origin. Although there have been anecdotal reports of cytokeratin expression within tissues and neoplasms of non-epithelial origin, particularly muscle, there have been no comprehensive studies of its frequency and distribution. In order to investigate this we have studied 51 cases of normal smooth muscle and benign and malignant smooth muscle tumours using a panel of monoclonal antibodies against a range of intermediate filaments (cytokeratins, desmin and vimentin). Cytokeratin expression was noted overall in 50% of normal, benign and malignant smooth muscle tissues. Such expression tended to have a focal or patchy distribution. No case expressed cytokeratins in the absence of both desmin and vimentin. The implication of these findings for diagnostic immunocytochemistry is that intermediate filaments alone are not completely reliable markers of tumour histogenesis and should be used as part of a larger panel of monoclonal antibodies.