Water is the driving variable in Great Plains agriculture and sustainability depends on efficient use of incident precipitation. Spring and winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)‐fallow (SWF and WWF) farming systems, as currently practiced, are not economically sustainable without government subsidies. This paper synthesizes information regarding the water use efficiency (WUE) of intensified cropping systems in cultivated dryland agroecosystems and proposes solutions to ensure sustainablity. Decreasing tillage and maintaining crop residue on the soil is requisite to improved efficiency. No‐till fallow efficiency, the percentage of the precipitation stored during fallow, reached 40% in the early 1970s. However, scientists in the 1980s and 1990s still report fallow efficiencies no greater than 40%, indicating that other major system changes must occur if progress is to continue. Residue levels in the Great Plains usually are < 3 tons/acre and this probably has capped fallow efficiency near 40%. No‐till management of crop residues after spring or winter wheat harvest increases soil water storage in the first portion of the fallow (July to May) compared with conventional fallow management, but the soil in the late fallow period (June to September for winter wheat and June to May for spring wheat) gains no more water, and may even lose water relative to the quantity present in the spring. Overall system efficiency is best evaluated by calculating grain WUE values. Modern no‐till wheat‐fallow (WF) systems, even with maximum fallow efficiencies, only had average grain WUE of 104 lb/acre per in. for spring wheat and 140 lb/acre per in. for winter wheat. WUE for 3‐yr cropping systems, like winter wheat‐corn (Zea mays L)‐fallow or winter wheat‐sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]‐fallow, increased WUE in Central and Southern Great Plains. Three year system WUE averaged 180 lb/acre per in., a 28% increase compared with WF. In the Northern Plains, continuous spring wheat systems averaged 122 lb/acre per in., a 15% increase compared with SWF. Individual crops within systems had the following potential WUE values: corn = 245 lb/acre per in., grain sorghum =225 lb/acre per in., proso millet (Panicum miliuceum L). = 195 lb/acre per in., spring wheat = 216 lb/acre per in., and winter wheat = 150 lb/acre per in. Maximum system efficiency depends on choosing the most efficient plants for a given geographic area. Intensified cropping systems improve our ability to use precipitation efficiently. However, adoption of higher intensity cropping systems depends more on economic outcomes and government programs than on WUE or environmental effects. Research Question Water is the driving variable in Great Plains agriculture and sustainablity depends on efficient use of precipitation. If Great Plains agriculture is to be economically and environmentally sustainable, systems must be developed that maximize water storage efficiency and grain water use efficiency (WUE). The main objective of this paper was to synthesize existing information rega...

No abstract

No abstract

The extreme climate of the northern Great Plains of North America requires cropping systems to possess a resilient soil resource in order to be sustainable. This paper summarizes the interactive effects of tillage, crop sequence, and cropping intensity on soil quality indicators for two long-term cropping system experiments in the northern Great Plains. The experiments, located in central North Dakota, were established in 1984 and 1993 on a Wilton silt loam (FAO: Calcic Siltic Chernozem; USDA 1 : fine-silty, mixed, superactive frigid Pachic Haplustoll). Soil physical, chemical, and biological properties considered as indicators of soil quality were evaluated in spring 2001 in both experiments at depths of 0-7.5, 7.5-15, and 15-30 cm. Management effects on soil properties were largely limited to the surface 7.5 cm in both experiments. For the experiment established in 1984, differences in soil condition between a continuous crop, no-till system and a crop-fallow, conventional tillage system were substantial. Within the surface 7.5 cm, the continuous crop, no-till system possessed significantly more soil organic C (by 7.28 Mg ha −1 ), particulate organic matter C (POM-C) (by 4.98 Mg ha −1 ), potentially mineralizable N (PMN) (by 32.4 kg ha −1 ), and microbial biomass C (by 586 kg ha −1 ), as well as greater aggregate stability (by 33.4%) and faster infiltration rates (by 55.6 cm h −1 ) relative to the crop-fallow, conventional tillage system. Thus, soil from the continuous crop, no-till system was improved with respect to its ability to provide a source for plant nutrients, withstand erosion, and facilitate water transfer. Soil properties were affected less by management practices in the experiment established in 1993, although organic matter related properties tended to be greater under continuous cropping or minimum tillage than crop sequences with fallow or no-till. In particular, PMN and microbial biomass C were greatest in continuous spring wheat (with residue removed) (22.5 kg ha −1 for PMN; 792 kg ha −1 for microbial biomass C) as compared with sequences with fallow (SW-S-F and SW-F) (Average = 15.9 kg ha −1 for PMN; 577 kg ha −1 for microbial biomass C). Results from both experiments confirm that farmers in the northern Great Plains of North America can improve soil quality and agricultural sustainability by adopting production systems that employ intensive cropping practices with reduced tillage management.

Agriculture has been very successful in addressing the food and fiber needs of today's world population. However, there are increasing concerns about the economic, environmental and social costs of this success. Integrated agricultural systems may provide a means to address these concerns while increasing sustainability. This paper reviews the potential for and challenges to integrated agricultural systems, evaluates different agricultural systems in a hierarchical systems framework, and provides definitions and examples for each of the systems. This paper also describes the concept of dynamic-integrated agricultural systems and calls for the development of principles to use in developing and researching integrated agricultural systems. The concepts in this paper have arisen from the first in a series of planned workshops to organize common principles, criteria and indicators across physiographic regions in integrated agricultural systems. Integrated agricultural systems have multiple enterprises that interact in space and time, resulting in a synergistic resource transfer among enterprises. Dynamic-integrated agricultural systems have multiple enterprises managed in a dynamic manner. The key difference between dynamic-integrated agricultural systems and integrated agricultural systems is in management philosophy. In an integrated agricultural system, management decisions, such as type and amount of commodities to produce, are predetermined. In a dynamic-integrated system, decisions are made at the most opportune time using the best available knowledge. We developed a hierarchical scheme for agricultural systems ranging from basic agricultural production systems, which are the simplest system with no resource flow between enterprises, to dynamic-integrated agricultural systems. As agricultural systems move up in the hierarchy, their complexity, amount of management needed, and sustainability also increases. A key aspect of sustainability is the ability to adapt to future challenges. We argue that sustainable systems need built-in flexibility to achieve this goal.