Four Holstein cows fitted with ruminal cannulas were used in a 4 x 4 Latin square design (28-d periods) with a 2 x 2 factorial arrangement of treatments to investigate the effects of addition of a specific mixture of essential oil compounds (MEO; 0 vs. 750 mg/d) and silage source [alfalfa silage (AS) vs. corn silage (CS)] on digestion, ruminal fermentation, rumen microbial populations, milk production, and milk composition. Total mixed rations containing either AS or CS as the sole forage source were balanced to be isocaloric and isonitrogenous. In general, no interactions between MEO addition and silage source were observed. Except for ruminal pH and milk lactose content, which were increased by MEO supplementation, no changes attributable to the administration of MEO were observed for feed intake, nutrient digestibility, end-products of ruminal fermentation, microbial counts, and milk performance. Dry matter intake and milk production were not affected by replacing AS with CS in the diet. However, cows fed CS-based diets produced milk with lower fat and higher protein and urea N concentrations than cows fed AS-based diets. Replacing AS with CS increased the concentration of NH(3)-N and reduced the acetate-to-propionate ratio in ruminal fluid. Total viable bacteria, cellulolytic bacteria, and protozoa were not influenced by MEO supplementation, but the total viable bacteria count was higher with CS- than with AS-based diets. The apparent digestibility of crude protein did not differ between the AS and CS treatments, but digestibilities of neutral detergent fiber and acid detergent fiber were lower when cows were fed CS-based diets than when they were fed AS-based diets. Duodenal bacterial N flow, estimated using urinary purine derivatives and the amount of N retained, increased in cows fed CS-based diets compared with those fed AS-based diets. Feeding cows AS increased the milk fat contents of cis-9, trans-11 18:2 (conjugated linoleic acid) and 18:3 (n-3 fatty acid) compared with feeding cows CS. Results from this study showed limited effects of MEO supplementation on nutrient utilization, ruminal fermentation, and milk performance when cows were fed diets containing either AS or CS as the sole forage source.
Four lactating Holstein cows fitted with ruminal and duodenal cannulas were used in a 4 x 4 Latin square design to determine the effects of feeding micronized and extruded flaxseed on milk composition and blood profile in late lactation. Four diets were formulated: a control (C) diet with no flaxseed, a raw flaxseed (RF) diet, a micronized flaxseed (MF) diet, and an extruded flaxseed (EF) diet. Flaxseed diets contained 12.6% flax-seed (dry matter basis). Experimental periods consisted of 21 d of diet adaptation and 7 d of data collection. Feeding flaxseed reduced milk yield and energy-corrected milk by 1.8 and 1.4 kg/d, respectively. Yields of milk protein and casein were also lower for cows fed flaxseed diets than for those fed the C diet. Milk yield (1.6 kg/d) and milk fat percentage (0.4 percentage unit) were lower for cows fed EF than those fed MF. Plasma cholesterol and nonesterified fatty acid concentrations were higher for cows fed flaxseed diets relative to those fed the C diet. Flaxseed supplementation decreased plasma concentrations of medium-chain (MCFA) and saturated (SFA) fatty acids and increased concentrations of long-chain (LCFA) and monounsaturated fatty acids. Feeding flaxseed reduced the concentrations of short-chain fatty acids (SCFA), MCFA, and SFA in milk fat. Consequently, concentrations of LCFA and unsaturated fatty acids were higher for cows fed flaxseed diets than for those fed the C diet. Flaxseed supplementation increased average concentrations of C(18:3) and conjugated linoleic acid by 152 and 68%, respectively. Micronization increased C(18:3) level, and extrusion reduced concentrations of SCFA and SFA in milk. It was concluded that feeding raw or heated flaxseed to dairy cows alters blood and milk fatty acid composition. Feeding extruded flaxseed relative to raw or micronized flaxseed had negative effects on milk yield and milk composition.
Four lactating Holstein cows with ruminal and duo-denal cannulas were used in a 4 x 4 latin square design to determine the effects of feeding heat-treated flaxseed on ruminal fermentation and site and extent of nutrient utilization. Four diets were formulated: a control diet with no flaxseed, a raw flaxseed diet (RF), a micronized flaxseed diet (MF), and an extruded flaxseed diet (EF). Flaxseed diets contained 12.6% flaxseed (dry matter [DM] basis). Ruminal pH, NH3 N, and total concentration of volatile fatty acids were not affected by dietary treatments. However, feeding flaxseed decreased the molar proportion of acetate and increased that of propionate. Flaxseed supplementation had no effect on ruminal digestion of DM, organic matter (OM), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), crude protein (CP), fatty acids (FA), and gross energy. However, ruminal digestion of acid detergent fiber (ADF) was lower for cows fed the flaxseed diets than for cows fed the control diet. Feeding flaxseed tended to increase post-ruminal and total tract digestibilities of DM, OM, NDF, and gross energy. Feeding heat-treated flaxseed diets relative to RF had no effect on ruminal, post-ruminal, and total tract nutrient digestibilities. Cows fed EF had higher ruminal and lower post-ruminal digestibilities of DM, OM, ADF, CP, and FA than cows fed MF. However, total tract digestibilities were similar for the 2 heat treatments. It was concluded that flaxseed supplementation improved total tract nutrient utilization with no adverse effects on ruminal fermentation. Extrusion failed to protect flaxseed from ruminal digestion. However, micronization can be used to increase the ruminal undegraded protein value of flaxseed.
The objective of this meta-analysis was to determine the effects of the substitution of a protein source by canola meal (CM) on lactational responses (CM minus control) in dairy cows. The study included 49 comparisons of isonitrogenous (± 1.0% dietary CP content) dietary treatments published since 1975 (27 experiments). The CM intake ranged from 1.0 to 4.0 kg/d (standard deviation = 0.65). Regressions were forced through the origin, weighted by sample size, and controlled for changes in dry matter intake and in dietary concentrations of CP and ether extract. Milk yield and milk protein yield responded positively to the substitution of a protein source by CM. The response in milk protein yield was affected by the type of protein source that was substituted; the positive response was half less when CM was substituted for soybean meal compared with substitution of CM for other protein sources. The latter effect was in part related to a positive response on milk protein percentage when CM replaced protein sources other than soybean meal. The response in efficiency of N utilization (milk N yield/N intake) was positive to the substitution of a protein source by CM. Negative changes in supply of metabolizable protein (MP) estimated from the 2001 National Research Council model were associated with positive responses in milk protein yield with CM substitution, a finding contrary to the expected positive relationship between supply of MP and milk protein yield. In conclusion, a protein supplement can be substituted by CM with positive effects on milk and milk protein production. These data also indicate an underestimation of MP supply associated with CM inclusion in dairy rations using the National Research Council model.
Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) cut at sundown has been shown to contain greater concentration of total nonstructural carbohydrates (TNC) than that cut at sunup. Fourteen multiparous (8 ruminally cannulated) and 2 primiparous lactating dairy cows were randomly assigned to 2 treatments in a crossover design (2 periods of 24 d) to investigate the effects of alfalfa daytime cutting management on ruminal metabolism, nutrient digestibility, N balance, and milk yield. Half of each alfalfa field (total of 3 fields) was cut at sundown (PM) after a sunny day, whereas the second half was cut at sunup (AM) on the following day. Both PM and AM cuts were field-wilted and harvested as baleage (531 +/- 15.0 g of dry matter/kg of fresh matter). Bales (PM and AM) were ranked according to their concentrations of TNC, paired, and each pair of PM and AM baleages was then assigned to each experimental day (total of 48 d). The difference in TNC concentration between PM and AM baleages fed during the 10 d of data and sample collection varied from -10 to 50 g/kg of dry matter. Each pair of baleage was fed ad libitum to cows once daily with no concentrate. Ruminal molar proportion of acetate and total volatile fatty acid concentration were greater in animals fed the AM baleage, whereas the proportion of valerate was greater with PM baleage; no other significant changes in ruminal molar proportions of volatile fatty acids were observed between forage treatments. Digestible organic matter intake, organic matter digestibility, and plasma Lys concentration were significantly greater in cows fed PM alfalfa, suggesting that more nutrients were available for milk synthesis. Significantly lower body weight gain and retained N as a proportion of N intake were observed in cows fed PM alfalfa, thus suggesting that nutrients were channeled to milk synthesis rather than to body reserves. Intake of dry matter (+1.0 kg/d), and yields of milk (+1.0 kg/d), milk fat (+70 g/d), and milk protein (+40 g/d) were significantly greater in cows fed PM vs. AM alfalfa. Concentration of milk urea N and excretion of urea N as a proportion of total urinary N were significantly reduced, and milk N efficiency was increased when feeding PM vs. AM alfalfa, indicating an improvement in N utilization. Increasing the TNC concentration of alfalfa by shifting forage cutting from sunup to sundown improved N utilization and milk production in late-lactation dairy cows.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.