Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) and signal transducer and activator of transcription-5 (STAT5) play a key role in the pathogenesis of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN). In most patients, JAK2 V617F or CALR mutations are found and lead to activation of various downstream signaling cascades and molecules, including STAT5. We examined the presence and distribution of phosphorylated (p) STAT5 in neoplastic cells in patients with MPN, including polycythemia vera (PV, n = 10), essential thrombocythemia (ET, n = 15) and primary myelofibrosis (PMF, n = 9), and in the JAK2 V617F-positive cell lines HEL and SET-2. As assessed by immunohistochemistry, MPN cells displayed pSTAT5 in all patients examined. Phosphorylated STAT5 was also detected in putative CD34+/CD38− MPN stem cells (MPN-SC) by flow cytometry. Immunostaining experiments and Western blotting demonstrated pSTAT5 expression in both the cytoplasmic and nuclear compartment of MPN cells. Confirming previous studies, we also found that JAK2-targeting drugs counteract the expression of pSTAT5 and growth in HEL and SET-2 cells. Growth-inhibition of MPN cells was also induced by the STAT5-targeting drugs piceatannol, pimozide, AC-3-019 and AC-4-130. Together, we show that CD34+/CD38− MPN-SC express pSTAT5 and that pSTAT5 is expressed in the nuclear and cytoplasmic compartment of MPN cells. Whether direct targeting of pSTAT5 in MPN-SC is efficacious in MPN patients remains unknown.
Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are chronic stem cell disorders characterized by enhanced proliferation of myeloid cells, immune deregulation, and drug resistance. JAK2 somatic mutations drive the disease in 50–60% and CALR mutations in 25–30% of cases. Published data suggest that JAK2‐V617F‐mutated MPN cells express the resistance‐related checkpoint PD‐L1. By applying RNA‐sequencing on granulocytes of 113 MPN patients, we demonstrate that PD‐L1 expression is highest among polycythemia vera patients and that PD‐L1 expression correlates with JAK2‐V617F mutational burden (R = 0.52; p < .0001). Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays showed that chromosome 9p uniparental disomy (UPD) covers both PD‐L1 and JAK2 in all MPN patients examined. MPN cells in JAK2‐V617F‐positive patients expressed higher levels of PD‐L1 if 9p UPD was present compared to when it was absent (p < .0001). Moreover, haplotype‐based association analyses provided evidence for germline genetic factors at PD‐L1 locus contributing to MPN susceptibility independently of the previously described GGCC risk haplotype. We also found that PD‐L1 is highly expressed on putative CD34+CD38− disease‐initiating neoplastic stem cells (NSC) in both JAK2 and CALR‐mutated MPN. PD‐L1 overexpression decreased upon exposure to JAK2 blockers and BRD4‐targeting agents, suggesting a role for JAK2‐STAT5‐signaling and BRD4 in PD‐L1 expression. Whether targeting of PD‐L1 can overcome NSC resistance in MPN remains to be elucidated in forthcoming studies.
Despite new insights in molecular features of leukemic cells and the availability of novel treatment approaches and drugs, acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains a major clinical challenge. In fact, many patients with AML relapse after standard therapy and eventually die from progressive disease. The basic concept of leukemic stem cells (LSC) has been coined with the goal to decipher clonal architectures in various leukemia-models and to develop curative drug therapies by eliminating LSC. Indeed, during the past few years, various immunotherapies have been tested in AML, and several of these therapies follow the strategy to eliminate relevant leukemic subclones by introducing LSC-targeting antibodies or LSC-targeting immune cells. These therapies include, among others, new generations of LSC-eliminating antibody-constructs, checkpoint-targeting antibodies, bi-specific antibodies, and CART or CAR-NK cell-based strategies. However, responses are often limited and/or transient which may be due to LSC resistance. Indeed, AML LSC exhibit multiple forms of resistance against various drugs and immunotherapies. An additional problems are treatment-induced myelotoxicity and other side effects. The current article provides a short overview of immunological targets expressed on LSC in AML. Moreover, cell-based therapies and immunotherapies tested in AML are discussed. Finally, the article provides an overview about LSC resistance and strategies to overcome resistance.
Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a stem cell-derived neoplasm characterized by dysplasia, uncontrolled expansion of monocytes and a substantial risk to transform to secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML). So far, little is known about CMML-initiating cells. We found that leukemic stem cells (LSC) in CMML reside in a CD34 + /CD38 – fraction of the malignant clone. Whereas CD34 + /CD38 – cells engrafted NSGS mice with overt CMML, no CMML was produced by CD34 + /CD38 + progenitors or the bulk of CD34 – monocytes. CMML LSC invariably expressed CD33, CD117, CD123 and CD133. In a subset of patients, CMML LSC also displayed CD52, IL-1RAP and/or CLL-1. CMML LSC did not express CD25 or CD26. However, in sAML following CMML, the LSC also expressed CD25 and high levels of CD114, CD123 and IL-1RAP. No correlations between LSC phenotypes, CMML-variant, mutation-profiles, or clinical course were identified. Pre-incubation of CMML LSC with gemtuzumab-ozogamicin or venetoclax resulted in decreased growth and impaired engraftment in NSGS mice. Together, CMML LSC are CD34 + /CD38 – cells that express a distinct profile of surface markers and target-antigens. During progression to sAML, LSC acquire or upregulate certain cytokine receptors, including CD25, CD114 and CD123. Characterization of CMML LSC should facilitate their enrichment and the development of LSC-eradicating therapies.
The classical BCR-ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are characterized by over-production of myeloid cells, disease-related mutations in certain driver-genes (JAK2, CALR, MPL) and an increased risk to transform to secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML). Although considered stem cell-derived neoplasms, little is known about the phenotype and functional properties of disease-initiating neoplastic stem cells (NSC) in MPN and sAML. Recent data suggest that MPN NSC reside in a CD34+ fraction of the malignant clone. Therefore, these cells are considered most critical target populations to be examined for expression of molecular and immunological targets with the aim to develop improved or even curative NSC-eliminating therapies, such as antibody-based or CAR-T cell approaches. Using a panel of monoclonal antibodies (n=40) and multicolor flow cytometry, we established the immunological phenotype and target expression profiles of putative CD34+/CD38─ NSC and CD34+/CD38+ progenitor cells in patients with polycythemia vera (PV, n=18), essential thrombocythemia (ET, n=29), primary myelofibrosis (PMF, n=38) and post-MPN sAML (n=11). In almost all patients, the putative MPN stem cells expressed the stem cell invasion receptors Hermes (CD44) and ADGRE5 (CD97), C1qR1 (CD93), the migration/adhesion receptor MIC2 (CD99), and the stem cell antigen AC133 (CD133). Contrasting normal stem cells, MPN NCS and sAML stem cells failed to express Thy-1 (CD90). Among the cytokine receptors tested, MPN NSC invariably displayed the TGFßR-related antigen endoglin (CD105), TPOR (CD110), SCFR KIT (CD117), IL-3RA (CD123), CXCR4 (CD184) and IGF-1R (CD221). NSC expressed particularly high levels of KIT and low levels of TPOR and IGF-1R. The IL-2RA (CD25) was identified on NSC in most patients with PMF and sAML, and in a few with ET, but not in patients with PV. Similarly, the GM-CSFR (CD116) was found to be expressed on NSC in most patients with PMF, a few with ET and no with PV. MPN NSC did not exhibit substantial amounts of M-CSFR (CD115), IL-3RB (CD131), FLT3 (CD135), NGFR (CD271) VEGFR-2 KDR (CD309), EPOR, MET or OSMRB. The CD34+/CD38+ MPN progenitor cells displayed a similar profile of cytokine receptors. In addition, MPN and sAML progenitor cells expressed IL-1RAP and CLL-1 in most donors examined. We next examined the expression of various immunological targets and resistance-mediating immune checkpoint antigens on NSC and MPN progenitor cells. In all MPN patients and all sAML patients tested, NSC were found to express substantial amounts of Siglec-3 (CD33) and low levels of Campath-1 (CD52) and MDR-1 (CD243). In addition, MPN NSC and sAML stem cells invariably displayed the "don't eat" me checkpoint IAP (CD47) and the classical checkpoint PD-L1 (CD274). Exposure to interferon-gamma (200 U/ml, 24 hours) resulted in an upregulation of PD-L1 on NSC. In a subset of patients, MPN NSC expressed low levels of HB15 (CD83). In contrast, MPN NSC and sAML stem cells failed to express B7-1 (CD80), B7-2 (CD86), PD-L2 (CD273) and PD1 (CD279). MPN progenitor cells and sAML progenitors expressed an identical profile of cell surface targets and checkpoint antigens. Finally, we confirmed the disease-initiating capacity of MPN stem- and progenitor cells (CD34+ cells) using primary PMF cells in xenotransplantation experiments employing NSGS mice expressing human interleukin-3 (IL-3), granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and stem cell factor (SCF). After 28 weeks post injection, engraftment of human CD45+ cells in the bone marrow of NSGS mice was found in 15/15 mice injected with bulk mononuclear cells (MNC) containing CD34+ cells and in 0/15 NSGS mice injected with MNC depleted of CD34+ cells. Together, MPN NSC reside in a CD34+ fraction of the malignant clone and display a unique phenotype, including cytokine receptors, immune checkpoint molecules and other target antigens. The phenotypic characterization of neoplastic stem cells should facilitate their enrichment and the development of NSC-eradicating treatment concepts in MPN. Disclosures Valent: Allcyte GmbH: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria; Cellgene: Honoraria, Research Funding.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.