These findings support the further investigation of SNB as oncological augment for localized resective techniques. Specific prospective study should pursue this goal.
Introduction:Although atherogenesis is clearly entwined with systemic infl ammation, the risk-predictive relationship between preclinical and overt cardiovascular disease (CVD) and systemic white blood cell (WBC) subtypes remains unclear. Implication of an association would greatly facilitate cardiac risk prediction, assessment and monitoring. Methods: 1383 asymptomatic individuals (795 men, 588 women) attending for executive health screening were examined clinically as well as with phlebotomy and exercise stress testing to determine their ten-year risk of developing overt cardiovascular disease (as estimated by both Framingham and SCORE calculations). The signifi cance of their association with overall WBC and subtypes were determined using both univariate and multiple regression modeling. Results: Of all WBC subtypes, monocyte count was found to have the strongest, independent relationship with overall CVD risk by backwards linear regression modeling (Framingham: β = 0.057; p = 0.03; SCORE: β = 0.128; p = Ͻ0.0005). Independent associations with BMI (β = 5.214; p = Ͻ0.0005), waist circumference (β = 21.866; p = Ͻ0.0005), systolic blood pressure (β = 10.738; p = 0.003), HDL cholesterol (β = −0.639; p = Ͻ0.0005) and triglyceride concentrations (β = 0.787; p = Ͻ0.0005) were also evident. Overall WBC along with neutrophils, lymphocytes and basophil subfractions were variably (but less strongly) associated with such dependents and outcome measures. Conclusions: In conclusion, monocyte count, a simple inexpensive test, may provide useful predictive cardiovascular risk information in asymptomatic individuals to inform and guide attempts at interrupting CVD development at a preclinical stage.
Introduction:Although atherogenesis is clearly entwined with systemic infl ammation, the risk-predictive relationship between preclinical and overt cardiovascular disease (CVD) and systemic white blood cell (WBC) subtypes remains unclear. Implication of an association would greatly facilitate cardiac risk prediction, assessment and monitoring. Methods: 1383 asymptomatic individuals (795 men, 588 women) attending for executive health screening were examined clinically as well as with phlebotomy and exercise stress testing to determine their ten-year risk of developing overt cardiovascular disease (as estimated by both Framingham and SCORE calculations). The signifi cance of their association with overall WBC and subtypes were determined using both univariate and multiple regression modeling. Results: Of all WBC subtypes, monocyte count was found to have the strongest, independent relationship with overall CVD risk by backwards linear regression modeling (Framingham: β = 0.057; p = 0.03; SCORE: β = 0.128; p = Ͻ0.0005). Independent associations with BMI (β = 5.214; p = Ͻ0.0005), waist circumference (β = 21.866; p = Ͻ0.0005), systolic blood pressure (β = 10.738; p = 0.003), HDL cholesterol (β = −0.639; p = Ͻ0.0005) and triglyceride concentrations (β = 0.787; p = Ͻ0.0005) were also evident. Overall WBC along with neutrophils, lymphocytes and basophil subfractions were variably (but less strongly) associated with such dependents and outcome measures. Conclusions: In conclusion, monocyte count, a simple inexpensive test, may provide useful predictive cardiovascular risk information in asymptomatic individuals to inform and guide attempts at interrupting CVD development at a preclinical stage.
We noted a higher prevalence of MetS in the studied population when defined by IDF criteria. However, those identified by IDF and not by ATPIII definition did not have a higher cardiovascular risk score by either Framingham or European Score than those without MetS. Thus, application of the ATPIII definition of MetS, may be the more practical.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.