A targeted educational intervention can have a positive effect on medical students' knowledge, skills, and attitudes toward patients with disabilities.

We concluded that program director evaluations of resident performance do not appear to correlate with objective tests of either clinical skills or knowledge taken during medical school. These findings suggest that more structured and objective evaluative tools might improve postgraduate training program assessment of trainees.

Brief encounters with standardized psychiatric patients have been reported. In contrast, a videotaped objective structured clinical examination designed to simulate a comprehensive psychiatric evaluation was used to evaluate all students assigned to three successive psychiatry clerkship rotations (N=52). Performance assessment was based on standardized patients' completion of a 36-item content checklist and a patient perception scale, and on students' completion of a written examination component. Checked independently, all three assessments correlated with the students' score on the NBME psychiatry examination, their ward grade, and their essay examination grade. Students' ratings were favorable for time allotted, usefulness, and believability.

No abstract

Second-year students can use practice guidelines to successfully manage patients with diabetes. The students' performance exceeded the standards of care found in the published literature. This problem-based approach may be an ideal way to teach disease management.