Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, STKIP Siliwangi ABSTRAK Tes yang selama ini digunakan sebagai bentuk evaluasi sesungguhnya bukanlah satu-satunya bentuk evaluasi yang dapat dilakukan, melainkan banyak jenis lain yang dapat digunakan, di antaranya penulisan jurnal reflektif dan penilaian diri. Penelitian ini mencoba untuk merekam bagaimana respon dan hasil penilaian pembelajaran yang dilakukan melalui penulisan jurnal reflektif berbasis penilaian diri sebagai salah satu alternatif penilaian pembelajaran. Metode yang dilakukan untuk memecahkan masalah adalah deskriptif melalui survei dengan penyebaran angket dan praktik penilaian jurnal reflektif berbasis penilaian diri. Sampel yang diambil adalah para mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia. Dari data yang terkumpul diperoleh simpulan bahwa penulisan jurnal reflektif efektif digunakan dan menyenangkan karena responden dapat mengetahui potensi yang dimilikinya dan dapat meningkatkan keterampilan menulis. Selain itu, diketahui juga bahwa melalui jurnal reflektif berbasis penilaian diri, pembelajar dapat menuangkan keterpahamannya mengenai materi, mengaitkan materi dengan apa yang dialami oleh dirinya, mengetahui hal-hal yang menjadi kendala, serta merencanakan solusi untuk mengatasi kendala tersebut.

This research aims at describing the relation between students’ ability in critical reading and their mathematical critical thinking at Mathematics Education Study Program of IKIP Siliwang. Critical Reading is one of basic skills for students to comprehend and value information. Reading comprehension skill will affect their study. This research is a descriptive study specifically correlational design. The subject is 40 students of Mathematics Education Study Program who have enrolled the General Indonesian Language subject. The result showed that there was significant correlation between the students’ critical reading skill and their mathematical critical thinking skill, with significance value < 0.05, that is 0.000 and the value of correlation coefficient of 0.774, which means a very strong correlation and positive, indicating a direct relationship. Accordingly, students of Mathematics Education Study Program need to have and practice critical reading to facilitate their mathematical critical thinking.

This study aims to describe the effectiveness of online learning in Indonesian Language Courses (MKBI). The evaluation uses the Context, Input, Process, Product (CIPP) model. This qualitative research design uses descriptive evaluative. Data collection instruments used closed questionnaires, structured interviews, and documentation. Data processing techniques refer to the Guttman scale. The results showed the average value of the context evaluation aspects (0.92), input evaluation (0.85), process evaluation (0.86), and product evaluation (0.90). So, it can be concluded that MKBI's online learning at IKIP Siliwangi is very appropriate and effective.

This research is motivated by the need for learning in discourse studies courses. The purpose of this study was to design a learning model that supports the process of obtaining course learning outcomes that are oriented to the needs of students in the field, as well as to describe the results of model validation and Student Worksheets (SW). The research method used is development research with a 4-D design. Data collection techniques were carried out through document studies, observation, focus group discussions and distributing questionnaires. The model design product was validated by three validators from the fields of learning, IT, and lecturers of discourse studies. SW products are validated by three lecturers and four users from students. Data analysis techniques were carried out using descriptive qualitative and quantitative descriptive. The results obtained, the OBS Studio-assisted project model in discourse studies courses orientated on Pancasila student profiles is suitable for use in learning with the model validation results being in the "very valid" criteria with a value of 92%, the SW validation results are in the "valid" criteria with a value of 72 %, and practicality results according to users are in the "high" criteria with a value of 71%.