Information-based technology is one form of the era that is always there and provides benefits, namely facilitating the activities of all levels of society, including children. Internet or cyberspace is another name for information-based technology, the reach of the internet itself is wide, and therefore even minors can access it. Child grooming is a type of crime that is either the result of the expansion of cyber-crime grooming or an approach to deception. The mode used by the perpetrator in carrying out grooming is by starting to build a relationship with the victim, then creating the victim's trust in the perpetrator, the birth of the victim's trust in the perpetrator because of the emotional relationship that exists between the victim and the perpetrator. This study wants to analyze how the practice of sexual crimes during the covid -19 pandemic in Indonesia and how the role of the ITE Law in protecting children as victims of crime during the covid-19 pandemic. The method used by the author is juridical-normative. The results obtained are that the practice of child grooming crimes during the COVID- 19 pandemic in Indonesia tends to increase, this is due to the intensity of using gadgets on children more than before the pandemic, and this is due to the government's policy, namely distance learning.

Extradition and prosecution are cornerstones of international law cooperation’s enforcement to prevent immunity from criminal responsibility, especially regarding the refusal to extradite nationals. The principle’s implementation in its development is influenced by the trend from abolitionist countries to refuse the requests for Mutual Legal Assistance in criminal matters (MLA) related to death penalty crimes. Guarantees from requesting the state not to impose death penalty sentences needs to implement nationality jurisdiction if the state refuses to extradite its citizens to another country. Countries that impose death penalty demonstrate that the nationality principle is very successful in investigating crimes committed abroad, whereas countries that have abolished the death penalty consider the nationality principle to be a violation of human rights. This paper focuses its discussion on the usefulness of Article 8 paragraph (5) of the Criminal Code Draft, which regulates the exceptional nature of the death penalty in the nationality principle’s implementation. This paper concludes that the exceptional nature of the death penalty in nationality principles' implementation is regulated in Article 8 paragraph (5) of the Criminal Code Draft. This Article elaborates that a country of hindered crime could prevent MLA requests from Indonesia related to death penalty crimes based on its international obligations and the perspective of human right. This research uses a normative approach and pragmatic-descriptive analysis.