Introduction:Appropriate oral health care is fundamental for any individual’s health. Dental caries is still one of the major public health problems. The most effective way of caries prevention is the use of fluoride.Aim:The aim of our research was to review the literature about fluoride toxicity and to inform physicians, dentists and public health specialists whether fluoride use is expedient and safe.Methods:Data we used in our review were systematically searched and collected from web pages and documents published from different international institutions.Results:Fluoride occurs naturally in our environment but we consume it in small amounts. Exposure can occur through dietary intake, respiration and fluoride supplements. The most important factor for fluoride presence in alimentation is fluoridated water. Methods, which led to greater fluoride exposure and lowered caries prevalence, are considered to be one of the greatest accomplishments in the 20th century`s public dental health. During pregnancy, the placenta acts as a barrier. The fluoride, therefore, crosses the placenta in low concentrations. Fluoride can be transmitted through the plasma into the mother’s milk; however, the concentration is low. The most important action of fluoride is topical, when it is present in the saliva in the appropriate concentration. The most important effect of fluoride on caries incidence is through its role in the process of remineralization and demineralization of tooth enamel. Acute toxicity can occur after ingesting one or more doses of fluoride over a short time period which then leads to poisoning. Today, poisoning is mainly due to unsupervised ingestion of products for dental and oral hygiene and over-fluoridated water.Conclusion:Even though fluoride can be toxic in extremely high concentrations, it`s topical use is safe. The European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry (EAPD) recommends a preventive topical use of fluoride supplements because of their cariostatic effect.

The study examined the effect of noninvasive crown retrieval/reuse process using an erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet laser (Er:YAG). Twenty-six extracted human teeth were prepared for a crown. The crown was milled using lithium disilicate (LD) and zirconia (Z) materials, n = 13 per group, with three for scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The crown was luted using composite resin cement and subjected to a laser retrieval process. After the retrieval process, the crown was cleaned, re-cemented and laser-retrieved two more times, without and with additional tooth reduction mimicking clinical refreshment of dentin. Retrieval time and temperature were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA). Surface changes were observed through SEM. The retrieval times were 267.1 ± 130.43, 220 ± 79.09, 277.1 ± 126.44, 368.4 ± 136.14, 355 ± 159.39, and 419.2 ± 121.36 s for first, second, third LD and Z groups, respectively (p = 0.009). The maximal temperatures were 23.95.1 ± 1.89 °C, 24.86 ± 2.01 °C, 24.17 ± 1.53 °C, 22.88 ± 1.51 °C, 24.03 ± 1.74 °C, and 21.99 ± 1.32 °C for first, second, third LD and Z groups, respectively (p = 0.006). Er:YAG laser crown removal is an effective retrieval tool for all-ceramic crowns. Minimal changes to teeth and crowns were observed following laser irradiation.

No abstract

Background. Reduced tooth structure in the pediatric and adolescent population is frequently restored with prefabricated zirconia crowns. On permanent teeth, these restorations may need to be removed and replaced with permanent restorations. Objectives.To explore and compare the use of 2 high-powered erbium lasers for removing prefabricated zirconia crowns from molar teeth as a non-invasive alternative to rotary instruments.Material and methods. Twenty-five permanent molars were prepared to dentin and prefabricated all-ceramic zirconia crowns were fitted and cemented with resin modified glass ionomer (RMGI) cement. The teeth were randomly assigned into one of the 2 retrieval treatment groups: the erbium-doped yttrium, aluminum and garnet (Er:YAG) laser group (G1; n = 12) or the erbium, chromium-doped yttrium, scandium, gallium and garnet laser (Er,Cr:YSGG) laser group (G2; n = 13). The laser operating parameters for the Er:YAG laser were 300 mJ, 15 Hz, 4.5 W, and 50-microsecond pulse duration (SSP mode); for the Er,Cr:YSGG laser, they were 4.5 W, 15 Hz, 20 water/20 air, and 5 W, 15 Hz, 50 water/50 air, and 60-microsecond pulse duration (H mode). The experiment was repeated twice. The surface area and the volume of teeth and crowns were measured and the cement space was calculated. The retrieval time and temperature changes were tested and recorded. The data were analyzed with the t-test. The surfaces of the dentin and the crown from each group were further examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM).Results. The average time for crown removal using the Er:YAG laser was 1 min 32.7 s; for the Er,Cr:YSGG laser it was 3 min 13.9 s (p < 0.0001). The mean temperature changes were 1.41 ±1.36°C for the Er:YAG laser and 2.2 ±0.99°C for the Er,Cr:YSGG laser (p = 0.0321). The SEM examination showed no damage or major structural changes caused by treatment with either erbium-family laser.Conclusions. Both lasers are effective, non-invasive tools to remove prefabricated zirconia crowns cemented with resin cement and should be considered as viable alternatives to rotary instrumentation.

No abstract