Not infrequently when students are dealing with mathematics problems where they do not know what they are supposed to do. Learning in class can make a habituation to students. This study aims to determine whether or not there are differences in achievement of students' Low Order Thinking (LOT) abilities between learning Probing Prompting (PP) and Realistic Mathematics (MR) on quadrilateral. This research was conducted with a total sample of 60 students, namely 30 students in class VIIA with PPL learning and 30 students in class VIIB with MR learning. The sample selection is done by cluster random sampling. The instruments used to collect data are based on three dimensions in the cognitive domain, namely remembering, understanding, and applying. The results of the descriptive statistical analysis of the data show that the average achievement of students in the PP learning group is equal to 75.36, while the average achievement of students in the MR group is equal to 68.53. Based on the results of data analysis, it was concluded that there were significant differences in the LOT achievement of students between PP and MR learning on Quadrilateral material.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.