A summary and discussion is given of alternative models of the tectonic evolution of the Tethyan orogenic belt in the Eastern Mediterranean region, based on recent information. Model 1 (Robertson & Dixon 1984). A single Tethyan ocean continuously existed in the Eastern Mediterranean region, at least from Late Palaeozoic onwards. The dominant influences were episodic northward subduction of Tethyan oceanic crust beneath Eurasia, and the northward drift of continental fragments, from Gondwana towards Eurasia. During the Mesozoic, the south Tethyan area was interspersed with Gondwana-derived microcontinents and small ocean basins. Ophiolites formed mainly by spreading above subduction zones in both northerly (internal) and southerly (external) oceanic basins during times of regional plate convergence, and were mainly emplaced as a result of trench-passive margin collisions. In a related model, Stampfli et al. (1991) argued for spreading along the North African margin in the Late Permian. Model 2A (Dercourt et al. 1986). Only one evolving Tethys existed. Triassic-Jurassic oceanic crust (Neotethys) formed in a single Tethyan ocean basin located north of Gondwana-related units. Spreading later formed a small ocean basin in the present Eastern Mediterranean Sea area during the Cretaceous. Jurassic and Cretaceous ophiolites formed at spreading ridges and record times of regional plate divergence. In an update version, Model 2B (Dercourt et al. 1993), spreading extended along the northern margin of Gondwana, with an arm extending through the south Aegean, splitting off a large microcontinent. Further spreading in the Cretaceous then opened the Eastern Mediterranean basin and fragmented pre-existing carbonate platforms. The Mesozoic ophiolites were seen as being mainly far-travelled from northerly (i.e. internal) orogenic areas. Model 3 (Şengör et al. 1984). Subduction in the Late Palaeozoic was dominantly southwards, beneath the northern margin of Gondwana in the Eastern Mediterranean. This subduction led to opening of Triassic backarc basins; and a rifted Gondwana fragment (Cimmeria) drifted across a pre-existing Tethys (Palaeo-Tethys) to collide with a passive Eurasian margin. In their model, a backarc basin (Karakaya Basin) rifted and then closed prior to collision of a Cimmerian microcontinent in the Mid Jurassic, and this was followed by renewed rifting of a small ocean basin in the Early Jurassic. Mesozoic ophiolites mainly formed above subduction zones; they were variously seen as far-travelled (in the ‘Greek area’), or more locally rooted (in the ‘Turkish area’). Recent evidence shows that difficulties exist in detail with all three models. However, four key elements are met in Model 1: dominantly northward subduction in the north; multiple ocean basins from Triassic onwards in the south; supra-subduction spreading of the major ophiolites; and emplacement from both northerly and southerly Mesozoic oceanic basins. Palaeomagnetism has played an important role, in setting the large-scale Africa-Eurasia relative motion framework and in providing tests for the tectonic affinities of smaller units, but such smaller-scale studies have often been compromised by the geological complexity and by the remagnetisation of tectonically thickened units.

Similar Palaeozoic-Lower

Field evidence from north-south transects tests three tectonic models for Tethys in Western Turkey for when a Late Palaeozoic ocean was closing and an Early Mesozoic ocean opening. In Model 1, a Palaeozoic ocean subducted southwards, rifting continental fragments from Gondwana and opening a Triassic Neo-Tethys to the south. Closure and collision occurred by latest Triassic time. In Model 2, a wide Palaeozoic Tethys subducted northwards with an active Eurasian margin and a passive Gondwana margin. The northern Gondwana margin rifted in the Triassic; fragments either remained nearby (Taurides) or drifted northwards (e.g. Karakaya) attached to a north-subducting plate. New oceanic crust replaced Palaeo-Tethys with Neotethys and back-arc marginal basins opened along the south Eurasian margin (e.g. Küre). In Model 3, a Palaeozoic ocean also subducted northwards opening wide marginal basins. A wide Southern Neotethys opened along the Gondwana margin. Rifted Eurasian (Anatolides) and Gondwana (Taurides) fragments collided in mid-Tethys by latest Triassic time. Field evidence from the Pontides supports north-dipping subduction models (Model 2 or 3 above). Key features are a south-vergent, HP-LT accretionary prism, magmatic arc and back-arc basin system bordering the Eurasian margin. Also, evidence from the Tauride Mountains favours Model 2 over Model 3. Critically, the Anatolides and Taurides appear to have a common history and were unlikely to have been located on opposite sides of Tethys, as in Model 3.

Several pre-Jurassic tectonic units in NW Turkey are crucial to the current debate regarding the timing and direction of subduction of Palaeotethys, a major ocean that separated Eurasia and Gondwana in Late Palaeozoic–Early Mesozoic times. The most critical unit is the Karakaya Complex, a deformed, low-grade assemblage of oceanic origin which comprises a NW-verging, SE-dipping stack of tectonostratigraphic units, here interpreted as a Palaeotethyan accretionary complex. The units display lithologies consistent with origins in seamount, trench, abyssal and rifted carbonate platform settings. Clastic basin sequences developed on top of the complex. Other relevant tectonostratigraphic units in the area include ultrabasic rocks of supra-subduction zone affinity, which tectonically overlie Permian carbonate platform units with intervening metamorphic soles and mélanges. Restored structural trends suggest the presence of a southward-dipping Palaeotethyan subduction zone bordering Gondwana-related units during the Late Permian–Triassic. This was probably additional to more important regional northward subduction along the southern margin of Eurasia from the Eastern Mediterranean to the Himalayas.

No abstract