No abstract

The purpose of this study reconstructs Bapepam-LK's decision number 412 / BL / 2010 concerning the trustee contract refers to specific provisions on guarantees stipulated by Bapepam / FSA as in item 4 letter E which is still too common. Conditions of bail in number 4 letter E Bapepam Decree 412 is only limited provision of information, not a necessity. Password Security (if any) does not provide legal certainty for investors obligations in case of default. With juridical sociological research methods. The theory used to analyze the theory of justice that is dignified, then research the reconstruction of the law done by changing the special provisions Bapepam's Decision No. 412 in number 4 letter E on collateral (if any) by removing / deleting the words in brackets (if any), caused not show the certainty justice and dignity justice.

AbstrakSaat ini perkembangan ekonomi berjalan sangat pesat namun, ditengah pesatnya pertumbuhan ekonomi terdapat juga ketidakstabilan ekonomi yang kemudian memberikan peluang kepada pihak-pihak yang berkaitan dengan kegiatan pasar modal untuk melakukan kejahatan pasar modal. Banyaknya kejahatan yang terjadi dalam kegiatan pasar modal sejak tahun 2009 sampai tahun 2017 tentunyamenimbulkan banyak spekulasi tentang wewenang dari badan OJK yang bertanggung jawab dalam pengawasan pasar modalsehingga ini menjadi permasalahan dalam penelitian ini. Permasalahannya adalah bagaimana peran pemerintah dalam mitigasi kejahatan pasar modal Indonesia.Penelitian ini dilakukan terhadap kebijakan dan kinerja Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK). Jenis penelitian yang digunakan dalam penulisan ini adalah yuridis normative. Metode pendekatan yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini library research, dengan sumber bahan hukum sekunder. Sanksi terhadap kejahatan pasar modal tercantum dalam UUPM bahwa kejahatan dalam pasar modal dapat dituntut secara perdata berupa sanksi atas perbuatan melawan hukum, serta dapat juga dituntut secara pidana. Namun oleh lembaga regulator pasar modal, yaitu OJK cenderung ke arah ganti rugi atau denda/sanksi administratif. Dengan maraknya kejadian kejahatan pasar modal, Sangat diharapkan kepada OJK untuk dapat membuat regulator yang mengikuti perkembangan dengan keadaan dan kondisi yang terdapat dalam penegakan hukum pasar modal sehingga, dapat meminimalisir kejahatan dalam pasar modal serta tidak membuat investor baik nasional maupun asing takut untuk turut andil dalam pasar modal di Indonesia.Kata Kunci: Peran Pemerintah, Mitigasi, Kejahatan, Pasar Modal. AbstractAt present the economic development is running very rapidly but, In a middle of the rapid economic growth there is also economic instability which then provides opportunities for parties related to capital market activities to commit capital market crimes. The large number of crimes that have occurred in capital market activities from 2009 to 2017 has caused a lot of speculation about the authority of the OJK agency responsible for modest market supervision so that this becomes a problem in this research. The problem is how the government plays a role in mitigating Indonesia's capital market crime. This study was conducted on the policies and performance of the Financial Services Authority (OJK). The type of research used in this writing is normative juridical. The method of approach used in this study is the research library, with a source of secondary legal material. Sanctions for capital market crimes are stated in the Capital Market Law that crime in the capital market can be prosecuted in the form of sanctions for acts against the law, and can also be prosecuted criminal. However, by the capital market regulator, the OJK tends towards compensation or fines/administrative sanctions.With capital market events, it is desirable for OJK to be able to make regulators that follow developments and conditions needed in capital market law enforcement, can minimize crime in the capital market and It also does not make investors both national and foreign afraid to take part in the capital market in Indonesia.Keywords: Role of Government, Mitigation, Crime, Capital Market.

This study aims to examine the legal arrangements for the role and authority of the capital market supporting profession in the face of globalization, namely the notary public. Notary public is a public official who has the authority to make a contract deed or decision required by law to be made in confirmed documents. The position of a notary is regulated in Law No. 30 of 2004 which states that a notary public is the authorized official to make an authentic deed and other authorities. This study uses a normative juridical method that is analytical descriptive. The notary is authorized to make authentic deeds about all agreements, deeds, and stipulations that are required by legislation and / or that are desired by the parties concerned to be stated in the authentic deed. In addition, the notary must also ensure the certainty of the date of making the deed, keep the deed, give the grosse, copy and quote the deed, all of it as long as the making of the deeds are not also assigned or excluded to other officials.

<p class="JudulAbstrakIndonesia"><em>This objective of this research is to examine conflicts of interest for legal consultants in capital market crime. The method used in this study is normative juridical analysis with a library approach and using secondary data. The role of legal consultants is very important in the capital market, this is because legal consultants are required to provide legal opinions regarding a company. So, because it has an important role, a legal consultant needs to know the duties and obligations. Beside that, the information from legal opinions will be used by investors in deciding whether to invest their capital or not, because information in the capital market is a factor that causes the fluctuations in the price of securities or shares on the price of securities or shares. Therefore, in each assignment of a legal consultant, it is expected that legal consultants can act independently and impartially and in accordance with the code of ethics, professional standards and applicable regulations. Sanctions will be given to legal consultants who act independently and do not fulfill the code of ethics, professional standards and applicable regulations. The application of sanctions is also related to the role of the Financial Services Authority.</em></p>