COVID-19 is a global pandemic that continues to spread around the world, including to Africa where cases are steadily increasing. The African Centres for Disease Control and Prevention is leading the pandemic response in Africa, with direction from the World Health Organization guidelines for critical preparedness, readiness, and response actions. These are written for national governments, lacking nuance for population and local differences. In the greater Horn of Africa, conditions unique to pastoralists such as inherent mobility and limited health and service infrastructure will influence the dynamics of COVID-19. In this paper, we present a One Health approach to the pandemic, consisting of interdisciplinary and intersectoral collaboration focused on the determinants of health and health outcomes amongst pastoralists. Our contextualized public health strategy includes community One Health teams and suggestions for where to implement targeted public health measures. We also analyse the interaction of COVID-19 impacts, including those caused directly by the disease and those that result from control efforts, with ongoing shocks and vulnerabilities in the region (e.g. desert locusts, livestock disease outbreaks, floods, conflict, and development displacement). We give recommendations on how to prepare for and respond to the COVID-19 pandemic and its secondary impacts on pastoral areas. Given that the full impact of COVID-19 on pastoral areas is unknown currently, our health recommendations focus on disease prevention and understanding disease epidemiology. We emphasize targeting pastoral toponymies with public health measures to secure market access and mobility while combating the direct health impacts of COVID-19. A contextualized approach for the COVID-19 public health response in pastoral areas in the Greater Horn of Africa, including how the pandemic will interact with existing shocks and vulnerabilities, is required for an effective response, while protecting pastoral livelihoods and food, income, and nutrition security.

Pastoralists in sub-Saharan Africa have limited access to public services due to their mobile lifestyle, economic and political marginalization, and the limited health infrastructure that is common to arid and semi-arid lands (ASALs) where they primarily reside. This often results in poor health outcomes, including increased rates of maternal, neonatal, and under-5 mortality. One Health approaches that integrate human and animal health service delivery can help to improve pastoralists' health through increased vaccine coverage and improved access to services. Kenya has institutionalized One Health at the national level; however, progress at the subnational level has been limited due to sustainability concerns, competing priorities, and insufficient coordination platforms. To address this gap, this paper presents a One Health framework (OHF) to aid in the implementation of integrated human and animal health policies in Turkana County, which can act as a model for other ASALs. Utilizing a grounded theory design, we conducted semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions with human health, animal health, and pastoralist stakeholders. Inadequate engagement with the public sector was identified as a major limitation by community members. Factors that contributed to this include distance to health facilities and restricted department capacities such as availability of vehicles, personnel, and cold chain maintenance. Our proposed OHF harnesses the existing structure of service delivery in Turkana and establishes an official coordination mechanism to implement One Health activities, through the form of mobile "One Health Huduma Centres", offering a range of public services. This innovative framework is supported by stakeholders in Turkana and can improve service delivery constraints thereby improving the health of Turkana pastoralists.

No abstract

Given the recent emergence of Rift Valley Fever (RVF) in Rwanda and its profound impact on livelihoods and health, improving RVF prevention and control strategies is crucial. Vaccinating livestock is one of the most sustainable strategies to mitigate the impact of RVF on health and livelihoods. However, vaccine supply chain constraints severely limit the effectiveness of vaccination programs. In the human health sector, unmanned aerial vehicles, i.e., drones, are increasingly used to improve supply chains and last-mile vaccine delivery. We investigated perceptions of whether delivering RVF vaccines by drone in Rwanda might help to overcome logistical constraints in the vaccine supply chain. We conducted semi-structured interviews with stakeholders in the animal health sector and Zipline employees in Nyagatare District in the Eastern Province of Rwanda. We used content analysis to identify key themes. We found that stakeholders in the animal health sector and Zipline employees believe that drones could improve RVF vaccination in Nyagatare. The primary benefits study participants identified included decreased transportation time, improved cold chain maintenance, and cost savings.

In Kenya, pastoralists grapple with significant health and livelihood challenges due to livestock, zoonotic, and human diseases. These diseases threaten the sustainability of their unique food production system and its considerable value. Disease control and prevention in arid and semi-arid lands (ASALs) are currently inadequate due to underfunded and ill-adapted health programs coupled with a shortage of personnel. Participatory epidemiology (PE) presents a valuable tool for understanding community perceptions of disease importance and epidemiology, thereby aiding in improving control measures and promoting community involvement in centralized service delivery programs. Yet, the use of PE has been primarily confined to livestock and zoonotic diseases, leaving perceptions of human disease and the complex interplay between pastoralists, their livestock, and the rangelands unexplored. To address this gap, we utilized PE to achieve three objectives: 1) establish links between human and livestock diseases, 2) determine perceptions of disease priorities, and 3) assess knowledge of disease epidemiology. Our findings indicate that the relationships between human and livestock diseases primarily manifest in two categories: disease symptoms and zoonoses. Disease priorities differed between locations, with no apparent pattern emerging that human or livestock diseases are considered more important. Importance indicators such as prevalence, mortality, morbidity, and spatial/temporal variation were shared across human and livestock diseases. Diseases perceived as more prevalent and deadly were deemed most significant, while those seen as less prevalent, less deadly, and exhibiting more spatial/temporal variation were considered less critical. Our results underscore the added value of broadening the application of PE to include human diseases, which can help to improve disease prevention and control initiatives among pastoralists. Future studies and human, animal, and environmental health programs can leverage and expand upon our approach, combining it with traditional sero-syndromic surveillance to address health challenges among pastoralists in ASALs in Kenya and beyond.