Background and aims
The prevalence and significance of digestive manifestations in COVID-19 remain uncertain. We aimed to assess the prevalence, spectrum, severity, and significance of digestive manifestations in patients hospitalized with COVID-19.
Methods
Consecutive patients hospitalized with COVID-19 were identified across a geographically diverse alliance of medical centers in North America. Data pertaining to baseline characteristics, symptomatology, laboratory assessment, imaging, and endoscopic findings from the time of symptom onset until discharge or death were manually abstracted from electronic health records to characterize the prevalence, spectrum, and severity of digestive manifestations. Regression analyses were performed to evaluate the association between digestive manifestations and severe outcomes related to COVID-19.
Findings
A total of 1992 patients across 36 centers met eligibility criteria and were included. Overall, 53% of patients experienced at least one gastrointestinal symptom at any time during their illness, most commonly diarrhea (34%), nausea (27%), vomiting (16%), and abdominal pain (11%). In 74% of cases, gastrointestinal symptoms were judged to be mild. In total, 35% of patients developed an abnormal alanine aminotransferase or total bilirubin level; these were elevated to less than 5 times the upper limit of normal in 77% of cases. After adjusting for potential confounders, the presence of gastrointestinal symptoms at any time (odds ratio 0.93, 95% confidence interval 0.76-1.15) or liver test abnormalities on admission (odds ratio 1.31, 95% confidence interval 0.80-2.12) were not independently associated with mechanical ventilation or death.
Conclusion
Among patients hospitalized with COVID-19, gastrointestinal symptoms and liver test abnormalities were common but the majority were mild and their presence was not associated with a more severe clinical course.
INTRODUCTION:
Post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLDs) are the second most common neoplasms in adult transplant recipients. Epstein-Barr virus infection in the setting of immunosuppressive therapy is implicated etiologically in most cases. More than half of PTLD cases present with extra-nodal involvement including the GI tract. Few reports have described the endoscopic findings. We present a case of rapidly progressive PTLD involving the GI tract with gross lesions that developed less than 2 months after a macroscopically normal upper and lower endoscopy.
CASE DESCRIPTION/METHODS:
A 37-year-old female with history of orthotopic heart transplant 3 months prior for transposition of the great arteries was admitted to the hospital with 3 weeks of non-bloody diarrhea. Her immunosuppressive regimen included tacrolimus, mycophenolate and prednisone. Extensive serologic and fecal testing was performed with no evidence of systemic CMV, EBV, HSV (serum PCR), clostridium difficile, or other bacterial intestinal infection. She underwent diagnostic upper and lower endoscopy with no grossly visible lesions. Random colon biopsies demonstrated increased lamina propria eosinophils and eosinophilic crypt abscesses suggestive of drug-effect. A presumptive diagnosis of mycophenolate induced colitis was made. Symptoms resolved however during her hospitalization and she was continued on mycophenolate. She presented 6 weeks later with 3 weeks of recurrent non-bloody diarrhea. Repeat serologic and fecal testing revealed EBV and CMV viremia. CT abdomen and pelvis with IV contrast was unremarkable. Repeat upper and lower endoscopy revealed multiple new ulcerated nodular lesions 1 cm in size (Figures 1 and 2) in the stomach, duodenum, terminal ileum and entire colon. Biopsies showed monomorphic PTLD, diffuse large B-cell type, with EBV positive staining.
DISCUSSION:
PTLD can be isolated to the gastrointestinal tract in immunocompromised post-transplant patients. Endoscopy with biopsy is required to establish the diagnosis. When there is high suspicion for PTLD, consideration should be given for repeat endoscopy even with recent normal examination as macroscopic and microscopic findings may develop rapidly.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.