No abstract

Vestibular-proprioceptive interaction in human postural control in the frontal plane was studied by analysing the lateral body sway evoked in a standing subject by a weak, near-threshold galvanic vestibular stimulation combined with a balanced, bilateral vibration of the medial gluteus muscles. The intensities of the stimuli were adjusted so that none of them produced a consistent postural response when delivered alone. The pattern of the lateral body sway evoked by the combined stimulation was compared with postural responses to suprathreshold vestibular stimulation and asymmetric (unilateral) vibration of the hip abductors. During the vestibular stimulation alone the head movement started earlier and was larger than movement of the hip. During unilateral vibration the head movement was delayed with respect to the hip movement and the amplitude of head deviation was less than that of the hip. The pattern of postural response to combined vestibular stimulation and balanced vibration resembled that observed under unbalanced, unilateral vibration in terms of both the latencies and amplitudes of deviation of the body segments from their respective baseline positions. It is suggested that the asymmetric vestibular signal provided by galvanic stimulation of the labyrinth introduces a bias into the reference frame for central interpretation of proprioceptive signals so that a symmetric proprioceptive input gives rise to a lateral body sway when referenced to an asymmetric vestibular input.

No abstract

No abstract

We recorded the sagittal and frontal components of the stabilogram of healthy humans in upright undisturbed stance under five conditions of visual control: (i) open eyes (OE); (ii) closed eyes (CE); (iii) visual inversion (VI); (iv) central vision (CV), and (v) diffused light (DL). Through a low-pass filter of trajectories of the center of pressure of feet (CPF), the vertical projection of the center of gravity (CG) and, consequently, the difference CPF-CG were estimated. The former represents the controlled variable, while the latter is proportional to the horizontal acceleration and assumed to express the resultant joint stiffness (mostly in the ankle joints). The stiffness was characterized through a method based on spectral analysis of the CPF-CG variable and subsequent calculations of the median frequency (MF) and the root mean square (RMS) of the spectra. The median frequencies of the spectra of the CPF-CG variable changed slightly under various visual conditions. At standing on a rigid support, they varied from 0.97 to 0.99 Hz and from 0.93 to 0.97 Hz for the CPF-CG, calculated from the sagittal and frontal components of the stabilogram, respectively. Under conditions of a pliable support, the corresponding frequencies varied within the limits of 0.79-0.83 Hz and 0.74-0.78 Hz. In contrast to the median frequencies, the RMSs demonstrated greater variability depending on different visual conditions. At standing on a rigid support, paired comparisons showed significant differences between the RMSs of the spectra of the CPF-CG variable of the sagittal direction under CE and OE conditions (0.14 ± 0.030 and 0.09 ± 0.020 mm, respectively) and under DL and OE conditions (0.130 ± ± 0.025 and 0.090 ± 0.020 mm, respectively). The RMS of the CPF-CG variable calculated for the frontal stabilogram differed significantly from each other for the VI and OE conditions (0.115 ± 0.020 and 0.075 ± ± 0.015 mm, respectively). In case of standing on a pliable support, a greater variability of visual influences on the CPF-CG variable was found. The RMS for its sagittal motion was the greatest under CE conditions (0.19 ± 0.03 mm); it was significantly greater than the respective values under OE, CV, and DL conditions (0.097 ± ± 0.020, 0.110 ± 0.020, and 0.140 ± 0.030 mm, respectively). The means of RMSs of the spectra of the frontal CPF-CG was also the greatest under CE conditions (0.20 ± 0.03 mm) and the smallest under OE conditions (0.095 ± 0.020 mm). In addition, the value of the RMS fluctuations under CE conditions (0.150 ± 0.025 mm) differed significantly from the respective values under OE conditions (0.095 ± 0.020 mm) and CV conditions (0.110 ± 0.020 mm). Thus, our findings support the statement that the influence of visual conditions on the maintenance of vertical stance is mediated (at least partially) by the mechanisms controlling the ankle joint stiffness. This regulation is mostly manifested in changes of a single parameter, the amplitude of fluctuations of the CPF-CG variable. We also found that the joint stiffness can...