Ischemic complications of the glans penis are rare and commonly result from trauma, inadvertent administration of vasoconstrictive solutions, diabetes mellitus, circumcision and vasculitis; we refer about a young man with severe ischemia of the glans penis following circumcision. The patient had undergone circumcision 5 days before in a surgery department under local anesthesia (1% mepivacaine hydrochloride). The patient noticed a brownish color and edema of the glans penis at 24 h after he opened the wound dressing, but arrived to our hospital only 5 days after circumcision because these findings had progressed. Physical examination revealed the black color or necrotic appearance of the glans penis, and edema on the dorsal penile skin. The patient underwent antibiotic, antiplatatelet, corticosteroid and iperbaric therapy achieving a complete restitutio ad integrum.

No abstract

Objectives: To evaluate retrospectively the detection rate of prostate cancer (PCa) located only in the transition zone (TZ) by directed cores at repeated saturation prostate biopsy (SPB). Methods: From July 2001 to December 2009, 380 and 43 patients (median age: 63 years) underwent second and third SPB because they were persistently suspicious for PCa. Indications for biopsy were: prostate-specific antigen (PSA) of >10 ng/ml, and PSA between 4.1 and 10 ng/ml or 2.6 and 4 ng/ml with free/total PSA of ≤25 and ≤20%, respectively. A median of 23 cores were taken in the posterior zone, including 3 (median) cores in the TZ. The median PSA was 12.8 and 19.5 ng/ml and the digital rectal examination was positive in 36 (9.5%) and in no cases at second and third SPB, respectively. In patients with persistent and/or increasing PSA or abnormal free/total PSA values after negative second and third SPB, a transurethral prostate resection (TURP) was suggested to avoid the risk of missing a cancer localized in the TZ. Results: PCa was detected in the TZ only in 2/82 cases (2.5%), and in details in 1/79 (1.2%) and 1/3 (33.3%) of the men diagnosed at second and third SPB, respectively. After TURP, a PCa was found in 18/95 men (18.9%; 14 stage T1a and 4 stage T1b) and in 3/15 men (20%; 2 stage T1a and 1 stage T1b) previously having had negative second and third SPB. Conclusions: Sampling from the prostatic TZ by directed needle biopsies at repeated SPB was associated with a very low incidence of PCa (2.5%), especially if compared to TURP (19% detection rate), and could be omitted.

Background: To evaluate the accuracy of 68Ga-prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) (Grade Group > 2) in men enrolled in Active Surveillance (AS) protocol. Methods: From May 2013 to May 2021, 173 men with very low-risk PCa were enrolled in an AS protocol study. During the follow-up, 38/173 (22%) men were upgraded and 8/173 (4.6%) decided to leave the AS protocol. After four years from confirmatory biopsy (range: 48–52 months), 30/127 (23.6%) consecutive patients were submitted to mpMRI and 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT scan before scheduled repeated biopsy. All the mpMRI (PI-RADS > 3) and 68Ga-PET/TC standardised uptake value (SUVmax) > 5 g/mL index lesions underwent targeted cores (mpMRI-TPBx and PSMA-TPBx) combined with transperineal saturation prostate biopsy (SPBx: median 20 cores). Results: mpMRI and 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT showed 14/30 (46.6%) and 6/30 (20%) lesions suspicious for PCa. In 2/30 (6.6%) men, a csPCa was found; 68Ga-PSMA-TPBx vs. mpMRI-TPBx vs. SPBx diagnosed 1/2 (50%) vs. 1/2 (50%) vs. 2/2 (100%) csPCa, respectively. In detail, mpMRI and 68Ga-PSMA PET/TC demonstrated 13/30 (43.3%) vs. 5/30 (16.7%) false positive and 1 (50%) vs. 1 (50%) false negative results. Conclusion: 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT did not improve the detection for csPCa of SPBx but would have spared 24/30 (80%) scheduled biopsies showing a lower false positive rate in comparison with mpMRI (20% vs. 43.3%) and a negative predictive value of 85.7% vs. 57.1%, respectively.

Objectives: To evaluate the incidence of indolent prostate cancer (PCa; <0.5 ml cancer and Gleason score, GS, ≤6) in men with microfocal PCa diagnosed on saturation biopsy (SPBx) submitted to radical retropubic prostatectomy. Methods: From January 2005 to December 2008, 413 patients (median age 61.5 years) underwent SPBx (median 30 cores). A single neoplastic microfocus (5% or less of cancer in a single core) was found in 55 men and all patients underwent retropubic prostatectomy. Median PSA was equal to 8.2 ng/ml, digital rectal examination was negative and GS was 6 in 40 cases and not evaluable in 15 cases. Results: Prostatectomy specimens showed a significant cancer in 48/55 (87.3%) patients with a median GS of 6.2 (range 5–8), presence of extraprostatic extension and positive surgical margins in 15 (27.3%) and 8 (14.5%) cases, respectively. Six patients had an indolent PCa, and in 1 case no tumor was found. Conclusions: Patients with a single microfocal PCa diagnosed on SPBx corresponded to an insignificant cancer in surgical specimens only in 12.7% of cases, but they should be informed that they may harbor more aggressive disease with a risk of non-organ-confined cancer that in our series was 27.3%.