The aim of this paper was to describe what experts of today believe are the main reasons explaining the caries decline seen in many westernized countries over the past 3 decades. We have collected the views of a number of international experts, trying to answer the specific question "What are the main reasons why 20-25-year-old persons have less caries nowadays, compared to 30 years ago?". A questionnaire was mailed to 55 experts with a number of thinkable explanations to be scored according to a predetermined scale. The 25 items were divided into main groups under the heading of diet, fluorides, plaque, saliva, dentist/dental materials and other factors. The experts were asked to think of a specific country or area, and also to specify whether the chosen area had water fluoridation or not. The main finding of our study, based on a 95% response rate, was that there is a very large variation in how the experts graded the impact of various possible factors. For the use of fluoride toothpaste, there was a clear agreement of a definite positive effect.

This study demonstrates that socio-economic differences in oral health and use of dental care are most marked in older (45-64 years) adults in Sweden, but are significant in young adults and, in terms of oral health, in children as well. A steep increase in user charges during the 1990s has been paralleled by a moderate increase in problems with chewing and the proportion of the population that has no regular dental care, which suggests a link that needs to be evaluated in further studies.

In order to map variations in the operative treatment threshold for occlusal caries, a pre-coded questionnaire was sent to a random sample of 759 dentists in Norway, 923 in Sweden, and 173 in the Danish Public Dental Health Service inquiring about caries and treatment strategies. A further intention was to explore the type of operative treatment and filling material dentists in Scandinavia would use given an occlusal lesion in the lower 2nd molar in a 20-year-old. It is found that close to 70% of dentists in the 3 countries would put off carrying out operative treatment of occlusal caries until they registered a moderately sized cavity and/or any radiolucency in dentin. In Sweden, 26.7% of dentists and in Denmark 24.3% would postpone operative treatment until the lesion had a large cavity and/or until radiolucency could be observed in the middle third of the dentin; in Norway, only 11.5% of dentists indicated this. The majority of dentists in all 3 countries preferred to drill only the carious part of the fissure, though in Norway more dentists (30.9%) would tend to drill the whole fissure compared to their Swedish (23.4%) and Danish (9.5%) colleagues. The majority of Danish dentists (52.4%) suggested amalgam for restoring the occlusal surface, while 19.9% of Norwegian and 2.9% of Swedish dentists would use amalgam. Composite was the first material of choice for 71.5% of the Swedish dentists, the remaining 25.6% suggesting conventional glass ionomer cement, light-cured 'glass ionomer cement', or a combination of glass ionomer cement and composite. The corresponding values for the Norwegian dentists were 39.1% and 41.0%, respectively, and for the Danish dentists 29.2% and 18.4%. In Scandinavia, the leading strategy for occlusal caries seems to be to postpone operative treatment until a definite cavity or radiolucency in the outer third of dentin can be observed, and to carry out operative treatment only of the part of the fissure that is carious. Composite resin is the predominant material of choice in Sweden, while in Denmark the majority of dentists preferred amalgam. Composite, or composite in combination with glass ionomer cement material, was the choice of almost 80% of Norwegian dentists.

A controlled study was carried out in mid-Sweden with the aim of comparing oral self-care and self-perceived oral health in 102 randomly sampled type 2 diabetic patients with that of 102 age-and-gender-matched non-diabetic controls. Oral health variables were also related to glycemic control (HbA1c), duration, anti-diabetic treatment, and late complications. Questionnaires were used to collect data on oral self-care and self-perceived oral health. Diabetes-related variables were extracted from medical records. Eighty-five percent of the diabetic subjects had never received information about the relation between diabetes and oral health, and 83% were unaware of the link. Forty-eight percent believed that the dentist/ dental hygienist did not know of their having diabetes. Most individuals, but fewer in the diabetic group, were regular visitors to dental care and the majority felt unaffected when confronted with dental services. More than 90% in both groups brushed their teeth daily and more than half of those with natural teeth did proximal cleaning. Subjects in the diabetic group as well as in the control group were content with their teeth and mouth (83% vs 85%. Those with solely natural teeth and those with complete removable dentures expressed most satisfaction. Sensation of dry mouth was common among diabetic patients (54%) and subjects with hypertension exhibited dry mouth to a greater extent (65%) than those who were normotensive. Our principal conclusion is that efforts should be made to give information about diabetes as a risk factor for oral health from dental services to diabetic patients and diabetes staff.