Aims The current study aims to examine the attitudes of healthcare professionals towards nurse–physician collaboration and to explore the level of satisfaction concerning the quality of collaboration among them. Design A descriptive comparative study design was used to demonstrate attitudes of 338 participants (158 internship nurses, 139 nurses and 41 physicians) working in intensive care units, surgical department and medical department. Methods Two instruments were used, socio‐demographic data sheet and Jefferson scale of attitude towards nurse–physician collaboration (JSANPC), it consisted of 15 items under 4 dimensions. Results The internship nurses have the high score (38.6%) in poor level of satisfaction regarding quality of collaboration between nurses and physicians comparing to staff nurses and physicians. Physicians are satisfied (61%) with the level of collaboration between them and nurses. Staff nurses have the high positive attitude (48.45 (4.03)) towards collaboration between nurses and physicians comparing to physicians and internship nurses. Conclusion Internship nurses were not satisfied with the level of collaboration between nurses and physicians.
Aims To assess the effect of nurses’ perception to workplace civility climate on nurse–physician collaboration and determine whether the largest contributor to changing the climate of the workplace are the employees or top management. Design This study used non‐experimental descriptive cross‐sectional study design, which using purposive sample (139 nurses) working at Health Insurance Hospital. Method The current study data were collected by using self‐administered questionnaires including three tools: (a) a structured interview questionnaire includes personal data; (b) perceived workplace civility climate scale (15 items); and (c) Nurse Physician Collaboration Scale (27 items). Results Main result of this study reveals that there was a positive statistically significant correlation between workplace civility climate and collaboration (0.208 * ). Studied nurses were perceived top management with the high score (87.5) than employees (65.2). Conclusion Workplace civility climate was demanded for well collaboration between nurses and physicians to provide high‐quality services; when nurses and physicians have increase chance to work in civility climate, combining with response to incivility and low intolerance for it, they will be more collaborated. Recommendation: Policies and procedures are very important in healthcare settings to address uncivil actions and establish a civilized climate.
Background: Promoting the level of knowledge of patients through education is one of the effective factors in increasing the patient responsibility in eliminating or changing unhealthy behaviors. Also, improving self-management of hemodialysis patients needs empowering the patients through educational program. Aim: to assess the effect of structured teaching program on knowledge and self-management behaviors for hemodialysis patients. Subjects and method: Design: A quasi-experimental (pre-post-test) design was used. Setting: The study was conducted in hemodialysis unit at Qena General Hospital. Subjects: A convenient sample consisted of 100 adult patients were selected based on the following inclusion criteria; their age between 18-65 years, and able to provide oral consent they were followed up for three months. Tools: Three tools were used for data collection; (I) patient's assessment sheet, (II) the hemodialysis knowledge questionnaire and (III) the hemodialysis self-management instrument. Results: Main results for this study showed that only 17% of studied patients had satisfactory level of knowledge in pretest, which increased to 93% in post-test. There was a statistically significant difference as regard hemodialysis self-management behaviors post implementing the structured teaching program P-value <0.001*. Recommendations:Continuous educational programs should be planned and offered to patients on regular basis in hemodialysis units. Also, further studies about home self-management of hemodialysis patients should be conducted.
Teaching styles play an important role in encouraging student engagement. Study aims: To determine the relationship between students' perceptions of teaching styles and students' academic engagement in South Valley and Assiut Universities. Study design: Descriptive correlational research design was used. Setting: The study was conducted at two Nursing Faculties in South Valley and Assiut Universities. Subjects: The study included 600 nursing students which chosen by a simple random sample. Tools: Two tools were used for data collection. Tool I was students' academic engagement questionnaire and tool II was teaching styles' questionnaire. Results: It was found that higher students' academic engagement (50.8%) in Assiut University compared to (49.2%) in South Valley University. Also, the most dominant teaching style was democratic teaching style with statistically significant differences (P=0.02, 0.000, 0.000) respectively as regard administration, pediatric and obstetric & gynecological nursing and reproductive health departments in South Valley and Assiut Universities. Moreover, there was a positive statistically significant difference between teaching styles and students' academic engagement as regard democratic teaching style in the pediatric nursing department in Assiut and South Valley Universities (P=0.000, 0.01) respectively and obstetric & gynecological nursing and reproductive Health departments in South Valley University (P=0.01). Conclusion: Students' academic engagement in Assiut University was higher than South Valley University. The most dominant teaching styles in South Valley and Assiut universities were democratically followed by authoritarian. Also, there was a statistically significant difference between students' perception of teaching styles and their academic engagement. Recommendation: The university and the lecturers should provide a positive teaching and learning environment which is up to date because it can form a conducive and suitable environment for students' academic engagement.
The study aimed to investigate the relationship between teamwork, staffing, satisfaction and self-efficacy among nurses at Main Assiut University Hospital. Design: A descriptive correlation research design was used. Subjects: The study included (161) nurses, they were convenient sample. Tools: This study utilized two tools: Tool I: The nursing team work questionnaire. Tool II: The Self-Efficacy Scale. Results: Most of nurses at Main Assiut University Hospital perceived their staff as inadequate at all working times but most of them were satisfied with their job position and team work. Conclusion: The highest mean scores of nursing team work dimensions was related to team awareness while the lowest was the team leadership comparing to all nursing team work dimensions. It was found that the higher score of nursing team work was related to ICUs comparing to other departments. Recommendations: Strategies to improve teamwork must be developed by the nurse managers through working on the all dimension of team work. Nurse manager must work to enhance the nurses' satisfaction and self-efficacy though engage the nurses in various activities.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.