The advent of novel measurement instrumentation can lead to paradigm shifts in scientific research. Optical atomic clocks, due to their unprecedented stability 1,2,3 and uncertainty, 4,5,6,7 are already being used to test physical theories 8,9 and herald a revision of the International System of units (SI). 10,11 However, to unlock their potential for cross-disciplinary applications such as relativistic geodesy, 12 a major challenge remains. This is their transformation from highly specialized instruments restricted to national metrology laboratories into flexible devices deployable in different locations. 13,14,15 Here we report the first field measurement campaign performed with a ubiquitously applicable 87 Sr optical lattice clock. 13 We use it to determine the gravity potential difference between the middle of a mountain and a location 90 km apart, exploiting both local and remote clock comparisons to eliminate potential clock errors. A local comparison with a 171 Yb lattice clock 16 also serves as an important check on the international consistency of independently developed optical clocks. This campaign demonstrates the exciting prospects for transportable optical clocks.The application of clocks in geodesy fulfils long-standing proposals to interpret a measurement of the fractional relativistic redshift Δνrel/ν0 to determine the gravity potential difference ΔU = c 2 Δνrel/ν0 between clocks at two sites (c being the speed of light). 12 National geodetic height systems based on classical terrestrial and satellite-based measurements exhibit discrepancies at the decimetre level. 17 Optical clocks, combined with high performance frequency dissemination techniques 18,19 offer an attractive way to resolve these discrepancies, as they combine the advantage of high spectral resolution with small error accumulation over long distances. 18,20 However, to achieve competitive capability requires high clock performance: a fractional frequency accuracy of 1×10 17 corresponds to a resolution of about 10 cm in height. Furthermore, it is important to realize that the sideby-side frequency ratio has to be known to determine the remote frequency shift Δνrel. Taking the uncertainty budgets of optical clocks for granted, harbours the possibility of errors, because very few have been verified experimentally to the low 10 17 region or beyond. 5,7,18,21 A transportable optical clock not only increases the flexibility in measurement sites but mitigates the risk of undetected errors by enabling local calibrations to be performed.The test site chosen for our demonstration of chronometric levelling 12 with optical clocks was the Laboratoire Souterrain de Modane (LSM) in France, with the Italian metrology institute INRIM in Torino serving as the reference site. The height difference between the two sites is approximately 1000 m, corresponding to a fractional redshift of about 10 -13 . From a geodetic point of view, LSM is a challenging and interesting location in which to perform such measurements: firstly, it is located in the middl...

Leveraging the unrivalled performance of optical clocks as key tools for geo-science, for astronomy and for fundamental physics beyond the standard model requires comparing the frequency of distant optical clocks faithfully. Here, we report on the comparison and agreement of two strontium optical clocks at an uncertainty of 5 × 10−17 via a newly established phase-coherent frequency link connecting Paris and Braunschweig using 1,415 km of telecom fibre. The remote comparison is limited only by the instability and uncertainty of the strontium lattice clocks themselves, with negligible contributions from the optical frequency transfer. A fractional precision of 3 × 10−17 is reached after only 1,000 s averaging time, which is already 10 times better and more than four orders of magnitude faster than any previous long-distance clock comparison. The capability of performing high resolution international clock comparisons paves the way for a redefinition of the unit of time and an all-optical dissemination of the SI-second.

We review experimental progress on optical atomic clocks and frequency transfer, and consider the prospects of using these technologies for geodetic measurements. Today, optical atomic frequency standards have reached relative frequency inaccuracies below 10, opening new fields of fundamental and applied research. The dependence of atomic frequencies on the gravitational potential makes atomic clocks ideal candidates for the search for deviations in the predictions of Einstein's general relativity, tests of modern unifying theories and the development of new gravity field sensors. In this review, we introduce the concepts of optical atomic clocks and present the status of international clock development and comparison. Besides further improvement in stability and accuracy of today's best clocks, a large effort is put into increasing the reliability and technological readiness for applications outside of specialized laboratories with compact, portable devices. With relative frequency uncertainties of 10, comparisons of optical frequency standards are foreseen to contribute together with satellite and terrestrial data to the precise determination of fundamental height reference systems in geodesy with a resolution at the cm-level. The long-term stability of atomic standards will deliver excellent long-term height references for geodetic measurements and for the modelling and understanding of our Earth.

The frequency stability and uncertainty of the latest generation of optical atomic clocks is now approaching the one part in 10 18 level. Comparisons between earthbound clocks at rest must account for the relativistic redshift of the clock frequencies, which is proportional to the corresponding gravity (gravitational plus centrifugal) potential difference. For contributions to international timescales, the relativistic redshift correction must be computed with respect to a conventional zero potential value in order to be consistent with the definition of Terrestrial Time. To benefit fully from the uncertainty of the optical clocks, the gravity potential must be determined with an accuracy of about 0.1 m 2 s −2 , equivalent to about 0.01 m in height. This contribution focuses on the static part of the gravity field, assuming that temporal variations are accounted for separately by appropriate reductions. Two geodetic approaches are investigated for the derivation of gravity potential values: geometric levelling and the Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS)/geoid approach. Geometric levelling gives potential differences with millimetre uncertainty over shorter distances (several kilometres), but is susceptible to systematic errors at the decimetre level over large distances. The GNSS/geoid approach gives absolute gravity potential values, but with an uncertainty corresponding to about 2 cm in height. For large distances, the GNSS/geoid approach should therefore be better than geometric levelling. This is demonstrated by the results from practical investigations related to three clock sites in Germany and one in France. The estimated uncertainty for the relativistic redshift correction at each site is about 2 × 10 −18 .

No abstract