Your article is protected by copyright and all rights are held exclusively by Springer Science+Business Media B.V.. This e-offprint is for personal use only and shall not be selfarchived in electronic repositories. If you wish to self-archive your work, please use the accepted author's version for posting to your own website or your institution's repository. You may further deposit the accepted author's version on a funder's repository at a funder's request, provided it is not made publicly available until 12 months after publication.
The amount and quality of carbon from forest litter present in the soil will depend on several factors, including species composition, management practices, plantation age, climatic conditions and soil texture, among several other factors. The aims of this research were to: i) quantify the labile organic carbon content in soils with Eucalyptus grandis plantations of the Mesopotamian region in Argentina and evaluate its relationship with the amount and type of litter; and ii) identify management, edaphic and environmental factors that may influence its variation. The study was performed on young and middle age plantations having soils with sandy and clayey texture located in the Gualeguaychú district, Entre Ríos, Argentina. To quantify the labile carbon in the soil, the soluble organic carbon was extracted with a 0.5M potassium sulfate solution. Soluble organic carbon concentration did not differ according to the age of the stands, with average values of 45.6 mg kg -1 in clay soils, and of 32.8 mg kg -1 in sandy soils, showing a positive association with clay content. The highest soluble organic carbon values were recorded during the summer months, and were positively related to the increases in the water-saturated pore space and the soil biological activity. We also verified a linear and positive relationship between the amount of initial fine litter and the increase of soluble organic carbon in the soil (R 2 = 0.41). The reported results provide explicit ranges of variability for total organic carbon, soluble organic carbon and carbon fluxes at local level; thereby contributing to further characterize carbon modeling in forest systems.
Nitrous oxide (N 2 O) is a greenhouse gas that contributes substantially to global climate change. The N 2 O soil emissions have a large uncertainty because of its low atmospheric concentration levels and enormous spatial and temporal variability, which hinders its correct field measurement. For this reason, there are many papers focused on improving the N 2 O measurements in the field, which focus on different parts of the measurement process. However, no studies have focused on determining the appropriate method, in terms of simplicity and precision, for the sample extraction from inside of the chambers and its transfer to the storage vials, although this step is key in the sampling process. This study aimed to assess and compare the accuracies of three simple and economical methods in transfer soil emitted N 2 O from inside of the chambers to the vials. For this, a highly accepted method (vacuum by manual pump) and two simpler alternative methods (gas exchange by displacement and vacuum by syringe) were compared. Thirty static chambers were assessed with the quantified N 2 O emission values varied from 0 to 450 µg m-2 h-1 of N-N 2 O. Out of the three assessed methods, the vacuum method through the use of a manual vacuum pump was the best to quantifying N 2 O soil emissions (capturing 57 % of the highest emission values), followed by the gas exchange method by displacement (30 %), and finally by the vacuum method by syringe extraction (13%).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.