Data from multi-day travel or activity diaries might be biased if recording inaccuracies and tendencies for respondents to skip certain types of trips or activities increases (or decreases) from day-to-day over the diary period. One objective of the research reported here is to test for such temporal biases in a seven-day travel diary. A second objective is to calculate correction factors which can be applied to the data in the case that biases are found. The analyses were conducted using regression and analysis-of-variance techniques. The variables investigated included total trips per day, total travel time per day, and trips per day by various modes (such as walking, car driver and car passenger). Results showed that most biases per capita statistics are due to increases over time in the percentage of respondents reporting no travel at all for an entire day. However, even after accounting for this bias by measuring statistics in terms of "per mobile person", there remains a decrease over time of about 3.5 percent per day in the reporting of walking trips. This appears to be the main factor in the overall bias of about one percent per day in total trips per mobile person per day. No significant differences were found among population segments in terms of the levels of their biases.
Objectives and ScopeTravel diaries, in which respondents record salient facts about the trips they make over a fixed period of time, provide the fundamental data for most studies of travel behaviour. Usually, the time period for such diaries is one or two days. It is quite possible that this emphasis on only one or two days of travel and related activities has severely restricted the subject matter and the methodologies of travel-behaviour studies. Indeed, several authors have pointed out the limitations imposed by diaries of one or two days (e.g., Scheuch, 1972;Goodwin, 1979).Extending the recording periods for travel and activity diaries, perhaps to seven days or more, permits the study of day-to-day variations in travel behaviour. Focus can be placed more effectively on activity patterns which typically occur in cycles of multi-day duration (e.g., weekly). Also, time and money expenditure patterns (so-called budgets) can be more effectively analysed, because one or two days is in general too short a time for observing overall expenditures. Examples of studies addressing these topics using extended-period data are provided by Bentley et al.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.