In a factorial experiment the effect of two protein intakes and three patterns of feeding in the second pregnancy of 48 Large White x Wessex Saddleback sows was examined. The high protein (HP) diet (19-5 % crude protein) contained 15 % white fish meal. The low protein (LP) diet (10-5 % crude protein) contained cereal protein only. Nutrient components of the diets differed in protein only. The pattern treatments involved allowances of 1-8 kg (L), 2-7 kg (C) and 3-6 kg (H) per day, the three pregnancy patterns being HL, C and LH with the changeovers made from the 49th to the 63rd day post coitunx (p.c). Sows on the three pattern treatments received the same total amount of feed from 0-112 days p.c. and were treated alike at farrowing and during lactation.Fertility and parturition results were similar for all treatments, but the number of piglets alive after birth (when weighed) was least for LP sows on the HL pattern. At 3 weeks of age the size and weight of litters on HP sows were significantly greater than those on LP sows (P < 0-05 and < 0-001 respectively). More piglets were weaned by HP sows than LP sows (P < 0-05). HP sows gained more weight in pregnancy (P < 0-001) which was slightly longer, and lost more weight in lactation (P < 0-05) than LP sows.The HL pattern of feeding was associated with smaller live weight gains in pregnancy than the LH pattern (P < 0-001) and the total birth weight of HL litters was lighter than LH (P < 0-05), mean piglet weights being similar. Lactation performance was unaffected by pattern treatment.The main conclusion is that a low intake, particularly during the latter half of pregnancy, of protein which is of vegetable origin, is associated with decreased viability of the piglets at birth and in early suckling life, and with lower capacity of the sows for milk production.
SUMMARYTwelve sows (F) were fed 7·3 kg/day and twelve (T) 3·7 kg/day of a 16% crude protein (CP) diet for the last 5 weeks of an 8-week lactation, so that at the subsequent service F sows were heavier (16%) and in better condition.From service to slaughter 70 days later, sows received either 3·7 kg/day (H) or 1·8 kg/day (L) of a 15% CP diet, giving four treatment combinations; FH, FL, TH and TL.In pregnancy H sows gained more weight than L sows and, on the low plane, F sows gained more weight than T sows. Ovulation rate as measured by corpora lutea count at slaughter was higher for TH than TL sows and for FL sows than FH sows. A combination of low ovulation rate and high mortality rate gave fewer foetuses (10·0) in the TL sows than in sows on the other treatments (13·5). Similarly mean foetal weight and thus foetal litter weight was least in TL sows. Foetal membranes, uterine fluids and uterine wall were lighter at slaughter in T sows than F sows and lighter in L sows than H sows, those of TL sows being appreciably the lightest.The results indicate that when the sow is in poor condition at service, body reserves being depleted, the uterus and its contents become more vulnerable to adverse pregnancy nutrition.
In a factorial experiment, two protein concentrations and three patterns of feeding were administered to eighteen Large White x Wessex sows (three per treatment) in their second pregnancy. Treatments were repeated in their third pregnancy, when balance trials were conducted. The high protein diet (HP) (19-5% crude protein) contained 15 % white-fish meal. The low protein diet (LP) (10-5 % crude protein) contained protein of vegetable origin only. The pattern treatments involved intakes of 1-8 kg (L) 2-7 kg (C) and 3-6 kg (H) per day, the three pregnancy feeding patterns beingHL, C and LH. Parturition results and lactation performance in the third reproductive cycle were
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.