The objective of this research was to recognize the law of hastening the payment of zakat on wealth and zakat al-fitr in the midst of Covid-19 pandemic. This research used a descriptive qualitative approach which was an attempt to understand various concepts found in the research process by using content analysis techniques and library research. The results of the study show that: first, it is possible to immediately pay zakat on wealth on condition that the ratio must be sufficient, according to a strong opinion namely that is the opinion of the majority of scholars; second, as for zakat al-fitr, the opinion which is a view in the Shafi'i school can be a solution for the current situation that it is permissible to hasten zakat al-fitr since the beginning of Ramadan. But the stronger opinion is that zakat al-fitr can only be paid one day or two days prior to the id according to a clear argument and guidance. As for the urgency of the needs of the Muslims, this does not necessarily become a reason that allows the hastening of zakat al-fitr so that it becomes the only solution that must be taken. However there is another solution, it is enhancing the encouragement for those who have adequate amount to optimize charity and alms aimed at our brothers and sisters who are in need in the midst of Covid-19.

This study described the groups granted with Rukhsah (concession) in Fasting and its Legal Consequence. The method used in this study is library research. Various literature was collected to obtain data and facts. These data are collected, sorted, selected and then analyzed to answer the four primary studies that are what is the definition of Rukhsah in general, what are the obstacles that allow Rukhsah to be granted, what is the concept of Rukhsah in fasting? And which categories are granted with the Rukhsah in fasting and what are the legal consequences? The results of the study showed that the Rukhsah is a law that applies based on an argument, which violates existing legal arguments (the original law / azīmah) due to udzur (obstacles). The obstacles as the cause of Rukhshah includes: journey (safar), sickness, necessity, forgetfulness, ignorance, conditions that are very difficult to avoid, and insufficiency. Briefly udzur (obstacles) or the requirements of Rukhsah could be: emergency (ad-darūrah), or the existence of difficulties (al-masyaqq ḍah) or just needs (al-hājah). Rukhsah is concession and the form of concession is ḍ concession granted for not fasting in the month of Ramadhan with the consequence of replacing the missed fasting in accordance with the Shari'ah known as qadāḍ’ or fidyah. The Groups that are granted with the Rukhshah in Fasting are sick people, travelers, menstrual and pureperal women, old people, pregnant or breastfeeding woman. Those are udzur or the causes of a woman to be granted with Rukhsah for not fasting

This study aimed to provide explanation and overview related to the law of tarawih prayers at home in an pandemic situation (Covid-19), the law of performing prayers at home with the intention of participating in congregation in the mosque, and the law of reciting the mushaf or mobile phones while leading tarawih prayer. This research used a descriptive qualitative approach using content analysis techniques and library research. The results show that if in an area where the potential for outbreaks of the covid-19 outbreak is high and there has been an appeal from the local government and scholars (MUI), then in these state the more important thing is to perform tarawih prayers at home, both congregationally with family members, and this is the preferred, or individually; (2) invalidity of the prayers of a person who follows the congregational prayers outside the mosque building, where the scholars agree that he must go to the mosque; and (3) it is permissible to recite from the mushaf in the sunnah (optional) prayers, such as tarawih prayer for imams who do not memorize the Koran. As for the obligatory prayers, it is disliked because there is no need to do so. This law also applies to someone who wants to recite the Koran with the software of Koran on mobile phones.

This study aims to describe the concept of handling fee contracts and analyze the review of Islamic law on handling fee contract in Cash On Delivery transactions at the Shopee Marketplace. The main questions of this research are; First, how is the concept of Cash On Delivery transaction contract at Shopee Marketplace. Second, how is the concept of handling fee contract. Third, how is the law of handling fee on Cash On Delivery transaction at Shopee Marketplace according to a review of Islamic law. This research is a qualitative research that using the normative and sociological approach. The research conducted a systematic literature review which summarizing the previous research on the topic. Then, the data collection were analyzed using inductive method. The results of this research shos that; First, Cash On Delivery transaction is a type of transaction where the customer pays for a product at the time of delivery. If customer refuse to pay the Cash On Delivery order twice in last sixty days, the customer will not be able to use Cash On Delivery transaction method on the next sixty days. Second, Handling fee is an amount of charge to customer for every check out. The handling fee is count on the top of their transaction subtotal. Third, the handling fee charged by the Shopee Marketplace on the Cash On Delivery transaction method when viewed from the perspective of Islamic law is appropriate, because it meets the pillars and conditions of buying and selling, namely mumayyiz, the seller is the owner of the goods, the goods sold are not najiz, and the satisfaction between seller and buyer.

This study aim to investigate the concept of dilālah fi'li al-Nabi in terms of interpreting the sunnah from the prophet. This study also aim to know the implication of dilālah fi'li al-Nabi of the perspective of fiqh ikhtilaf. The methodological approach of the study was qualitative literature review using philosophical normative approach and the rules of ushul fiqh approach. The results of this study indicate that: (1) The law of Istinbāṭ sunnah fiʻliyah has been considered to be different from sunnah qauliyah, particularly in an attempt to understand the dilālah. If the sunnah qauliyah is merely interpreted based just only by its language, the fi'liyah sunnah is interpreted based on the essence of prophets’ actions also. Therefore, it is necessary to have a deep understanding of determining the law of the Prophet's actions. The Prophet's position as a qudwah and a human being that Allah has given distinction to him made the application of the law become different to his followers. So that it has to be taken into consideration before deciding any laws related to the prophet’s hadiths. (2) Ikhtilaf uṣūliyīn on dilālah fi'l al-Nabī has implications on various fiqh problems which postulate the actions of the Prophet. Ikhtilaf happens in an attempt to understand fi’l al-Nabī al-mujarrad because there are no supporting argument or the qarīnah, the explanatory instructions which is useful as a lawmaker. Some uṣūliyīn think that taʼassī in terms of the actions done by Nabi Muhammads’ followers will be rewarded by Allah though the actions are not related to any worship. Therefore, the spirit of taʼassī to sunna Nabi must be follewed by a proper understanding and a proper application, because a contradictive application of maqāṣid syarīʻah can happen if it is partially understood and jumūd. In contrast, the other groups that are against this spirit must beware of falling into excessive attitudes that can ruin the good relation between muslims, and must beware of falling into deviations.