Metacognition has been shown to lead to deeper, more durable, and more transferable learning (Bransford, Brown, & Cocking, 2000). This article describes a case study in which metacognition was introduced to undergraduate science (chemistry) classrooms. Students came to understand the difference between superficial memorization and real learning through specific classroom interventions, which were also designed to help students develop metacognitive learning strategies. The aim of the study was to instruct educators how to incorporate metacognition in college science classrooms, and the improved cognitive and affective learning of students indicated its significance. On the basis of students' reflections, we assert that implementation of these strategies will contribute to increased learning not just in chemistry but also across other courses and curricula.
The mini-journal curriculum for undergraduate science laboratories mirrors the format of scientific literature and helps students improve their learning through direct scientific practices. The lab embodies the essential features of scientific inquiry and replaces the traditional “cookbook” lab to engage students in active learning. A case study of a mini-journal lab in college general chemistry, including its design, instruction, and reflections, is described.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.