Importance Cancer is caused by a diverse array of somatic and germline genomic aberrations. Advances in genomic sequencing technologies have improved the ability to detect these molecular aberrations with greater sensitivity. However, integrating them into clinical management in an individualized manner has proven challenging. Objective To evaluate the use of integrative clinical sequencing and genetic counseling in the assessment and treatment of children and young adults with cancer. Design, Settings and Participants An observational, consecutive case series (May 2012–October 2014) of 102 children and young adults (mean age, 10.6; median age, 11.5, range: 0–22 years) with relapsed, refractory, or rare cancer at a single major academic medical center. Exposures Each participant underwent integrative clinical exome (tumor and germline DNA) and transcriptome (tumor RNA) sequencing along with genetic counseling. Results were discussed in a multi-disciplinary Precision Medicine Tumor Board (PMTB) and recommendations were reported to treating physicians and families. Main Outcomes and Measures Proportion of patients with potentially actionable findings (PAF), results of clinical actions based on integrative clinical sequencing (ICS), and estimated proportion of patients or their families at risk for future cancer. PAF was defined as any genomic findings discovered during sequencing analysis that could lead to a 1) change in patient management by providing a targetable molecular aberration, 2) change in diagnosis or risk stratification or 3) provides cancer-related germline findings, which inform patients/families about a potential future risk of various cancers; Results We screened 104 patients and enrolled 102 patients of which 91 (89%) had adequate tumor tissue available to complete sequencing and only these patients were included in all subsequent calculations, including 28 (31%) with hematological malignancies and 63 (69%) with solid tumors. Overall, 42 (46%) patients had PAFs which changed patient management including, 54% (15/28) with hematological malignancies and 43% (27/63) with solid tumors. Overall, individualized actions were taken in 23 of the 91 (25%) patients and families based on actionable ICS findings, including change in treatment in 14 (15%) and genetic counseling for future cancer risk in 9 (10%) patients. 9/91 (10%) of these personalized clinical interventions resulted in ongoing partial clinical remission of 8–16 months duration or help sustain complete clinical remission of 6–21 months duration. All 9 (10%) patients and families with actionable incidental genetic findings agreed to formal genetic counseling and screening. Conclusions and Relevance In this single center case series of children and young adults with relapsed or refractory cancer, incorporation of data from integrative clinical sequencing into clinical management was feasible, revealed potentially actionable findings in 46% of patients, and was associated with change in treatment and family genetic counseling in a s...

Alzheimer disease is the most common cause of dementia. It occurs worldwide and affects all ethnic groups. The incidence of Alzheimer disease is increasing due, in part, to increased life expectancy and the aging baby boomer generation. The average lifetime risk of developing Alzheimer disease is 10–12%. This risk at least doubles with the presence of a first-degree relative with the disorder. Despite its limited utility, patients express concern over their risk and, in some instances, request testing. Furthermore, research has demonstrated that testing individuals for apoli-poprotein E can be valuable and safe in certain contexts. However, because of the complicated genetic nature of the disorder, few clinicians are prepared to address the genetic risks of Alzheimer disease with their patients. Given the increased awareness in family history thanks to family history campaigns, the increasing incidence of Alzheimer disease, and the availability of direct to consumer testing, patient requests for information is increasing. This practice guideline provides clinicians with a framework for assessing their patients’ genetic risk for Alzheimer disease, identifying which individuals may benefit from genetic testing, and providing the key elements of genetic counseling for AD.

SUMMARY PET ligands that bind with high specificity to amyloid plaques represent a major breakthrough in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) research. Amyloid neuroimaging is now approved by the US FDA to aid in the diagnosis of AD, and is being used to identify amyloid-positive but asymptomatic individuals for secondary AD prevention trials. The use of amyloid neuroimaging in preclinical populations raises important ethical and practical challenges, including determining appropriate uses of this technology, evaluating the potential benefits and harms of disclosing results, and communicating effectively about testing with patients and family members. Emerging policy issues also require consideration (e.g., legal safeguards for biomarker-positive individuals). Further research is needed to inform effective and ethical implementation and regulation of amyloid imaging.