BackgroundStudies in monkeys with intranasally instilled gold ultrafine particles (UFPs; < 100 nm) and
in rats with inhaled carbon UFPs suggested that
solid UFPs deposited in the nose travel along the olfactory nerve to
the olfactory bulb.MethodsTo determine if olfactory translocation occurs for other solid metal UFPs
and assess potential health effects, we exposed groups of rats to manganese (Mn) oxide
UFPs (30 nm; ~ 500 μg/m3) with either both nostrils patent or the right nostril occluded. We analyzed
Mn in lung, liver, olfactory bulb, and other brain regions, and
we performed gene and protein analyses.ResultsAfter 12 days of exposure with both nostrils patent, Mn concentrations
in the olfactory bulb increased 3.5-fold, whereas lung Mn concentrations
doubled; there were also increases in striatum, frontal cortex, and
cerebellum. Lung lavage analysis showed no indications of lung inflammation, whereas
increases in olfactory bulb tumor necrosis factor-α mRNA (~ 8-fold) and
protein (~ 30-fold) were found after 11 days of
exposure and, to a lesser degree, in other brain regions with increased
Mn levels. Macrophage inflammatory protein-2, glial fibrillary acidic
protein, and neuronal cell adhesion molecule mRNA were also increased
in olfactory bulb. With the right nostril occluded for a 2-day exposure, Mn
accumulated only in the left olfactory bulb. Solubilization of
the Mn oxide UFPs was < 1.5% per day.ConclusionsWe conclude that the olfactory neuronal pathway is efficient for translocating
inhaled Mn oxide as solid UFPs to the central nervous system and
that this can result in inflammatory changes. We suggest that despite
differences between human and rodent olfactory systems, this pathway
is relevant in humans.
Background
Engineered nanoparticles (NPs) are being developed and incorporated in a number of commercial products raising the potential of human exposure during manufacture, use and disposal. Although data about the potential toxicity of some NPs have been reported, validated simple assays are lacking for predicting their in vivo toxicity.
Objective
To evaluate new response-metrics based on chemical and biological activity of NPs for screening assays that can be used to predict NP toxicity in vivo.
Methods
Two cell-free and two cell-based assays were evaluated for their power in predicting in vivo toxicity of eight distinct particle types with widely differing physico-chemical characteristics. The cell-free systems comprised fluorescence- and electron spin resonance-based assays of oxidant activity. The cell-based systems also used electron spin resonance as well as luciferase reporter activity to rank the different particle types in comparison to benchmark particles of low and high activity. In vivo experiments evaluated acute pulmonary inflammatory responses in rats. Endpoints in all assays were related to oxidative stress and responses were expressed per unit NP surface area to compare the results of the different assays.
Results
Results indicate that NPs are capable of producing reactive species, which in biological systems can lead to oxidative stress. Copper NPs had the greatest activity in all assays, while TiO2 and gold NPs generally were the least reactive. Differences in the ranking of NP activity among the assays were found when comparisons were based on measured responses. However, expressing the chemical (cell-free) and biological (cells; in vivo) activity per unit particle surface area showed that all in vitro assays correlated significantly with in vivo results (R>0.81), with the cellular assays correlating best (R>0.87).
Conclusions
Data from this study indicate that it is possible to predict acute in vivo inflammatory potential of NPs with cell-free and cellular assays by using NP surface area-based dose and response metrics, but that a cellular component is required to achieve a higher degree of predictive power.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.