There is considerable interest in portable emissions measurement systems (PEMS) for emission inventory and regulatory applications. For this study, four commercial PEMS were compared with a Federal Reference Method (FRM) for measuring emissions from a back-up generator (BUG) over steady-state loads and a diesel truck on transient and steady-state chassis dynamometer tests. The agreement between the PEMS and the FRM varied depending on the pollutant and the particular PEMS tested for both the BUG and chassis dynamometer testing. The best performing PEMS for both the BUG and chassis testing was within approximately 12% for NOx of the FRM. For the BUG testing, several PEMS showed agreement with the FRM within approximately 5% for CO2. For the chassis dynamometer testing, the best PEMS showed agreement typically within approximately 5% for CO2. PM measurements for the BUG testing were low compared to the FRM, with the best measurements approximately 20% lower. For the chassis testing, two PM PEMS showed a good correlation but a high bias, while the correlation was worse for the other two PEMS. For each emissions component, some PEMS under different test conditions showed considerably larger deviations than those for the best performing PEMS.
This report was prepared as an account of work sponsoredby an agencyof the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees,makes any warranty, expressor implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy,completeness,or usefulnessof any information,apparatus, product, or process disclosed,or represents that its use would not infringeprivately owned rights. Reference herein to any specificcommercialproduct, prcx:ess, or serviceby trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarilyconstitute or imply its endorsement,recommendation, or favoringby the United States Governmentor any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Governmentor any agencythereof.
Two types of computer boards including custom-designed VLSI chips have been developed to add a qualitative reasoning capability to the real-time control of autonomous mobi!e robots. The design and operation of these boards are first described and an example of their use for the autonomous navigation of a mobile robot is presented. The development of qualitative reasoning schemes emulating human-like navigation in a-priori unknown environments is discussed. The efficiency of such schemes, which can consist of as little as a dozen qualitative rules, is illustrated in experiments involving an autonomous mobile robot navigating on the basis of very sparse and inaccurate sensor data.
Fuzzy logic based control uses a rule-based expert system paradigm in the areaof real-time process control. The VLSI implementation of a fuzzy logic inference mechanism allows the use of rule-based control and decision making in demanding real-time applications. The second generation of full custom CMOS VLSI has been designed. The chip consists of 688,000 transistors of which 476,000 are used for RAM memory. A Fuzzy chip has been successfully fabricated and tested. This paper presents VLSI architecture in detail. We have built VME-bus single board systems based on the chip for Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) and f o r NASA Ames Research Center. The board is now installed an a robot at ORNL. Researchers at ORNL uses this board for experiment in autonomous robot navigation. The Fuzzy Logic system board places the Fuzzy chip into a VMEbus environment t o provide application process control through a VMEbus host.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.