BackgroundNormal displacement of the conus medullaris with unilateral and bilateral SLR has been quantified and the "principle of linear dependence" has been described.PurposeExplore whether previously recorded movements of conus medullaris with SLRs are i) primarily due to transmission of tensile forces transmitted through the neural tissues during SLR or ii) the result of reciprocal movements between vertebrae and nerves.Study designControlled radiologic study.MethodsTen asymptomatic volunteers were scanned with a 1.5T magnetic resonance (MR) scanner using T2 weighted spc 3D scanning sequences and a device that permits greater ranges of SLR. Displacement of the conus medullaris during the unilateral and sham SLR was quantified reliably with a randomized procedure. Conus displacement in response to unilateral and sham SLRs was quantified and the results compared.ResultsThe conus displaced caudally in the spinal canal by 3.54±0.87 mm (mean±SD) with unilateral (p≤.001) and proximally by 0.32±1.6 mm with sham SLR (p≤.542). Pearson correlations were higher than 0.99 for both intra- and inter-observer reliability and the observed power was 1 for unilateral SLRs and 0.054 and 0.149 for left and right sham SLR respectively.ConclusionsFour relevant points emerge from the presented data: i) reciprocal movements between the spinal cord and the surrounding vertebrae are likely to occur during SLR in asymptomatic subjects, ii) conus medullaris displacement in the vertebral canal with SLR is primarily due to transmission of tensile forces through the neural tissues, iii) when tensile forces are transmitted through the neural system as in the clinical SLR, the magnitude of conus medullaris displacement prevails over the amount of bone adjustment.

Study Design. A controlled radiologic follow-up study. Objective. The aim of this study was to ascertain whether changes in cord excursion with straight leg raise test (SLR) at 1.5-year follow-up time accompany changes in clinical symptoms. Summary of Background Data. Lumbar intervertebral disc herniation (LIDH) is known to be a key cause of sciatica. Previously, we found that a significant limitation of neural displacement (66.6%) was evident with the SLR on the symptomatic side of patients with subacute single level posterolateral LIDH. Methods. Fourteen patients with significant sciatic symptoms due to a subacute single-level posterolateral LIDH were reassessed clinically and radiologically at 1.5 years follow-up with a 1.5T MRI scanner. Displacement of the conus medullaris during the unilateral and bilateral SLR was quantified reliably with a randomized procedure and compared between SLRs and to data from baseline. Multivariate regression models and backward variable selection method were employed to identify variables more strongly associated with a decrease in low back pain (LBP) and radicular symptoms. Results. Compared with previously presented baseline values, the data showed a significant increase in neural sliding in all the quantified maneuvers (P ≤ 0.01), and particularly of 2.52 mm (P ≤ 0.001) with the symptomatic SLR. Increase in neural sliding correlated significantly with decrease of both radicular symptoms (Pearson = -0.719, P ≤ 0.001) and LBP (Pearson = -0.693, P ≤ 0.001). Multivariate regression models and backward variable selection method confirmed the improvement of neural sliding effects (P ≤ 0.004) as the main variable being associated with improvement of self-reported clinical symptoms. Conclusion. To our knowledge, these are the first noninvasive data to objectively support the association between increase in magnitude of neural adaptive movement and resolution of both radicular and LBP symptoms in in vivo and structurally intact human subjects. Level of Evidence: 2

No abstract

3.

5.