We describe the development of FAD-Plus, a 27-item measure of lay beliefs in free will and 3 closely related constructs: scientific determinism, fatalistic determinism, and unpredictability. Previously published measures included only a subset of these variables and tended to assume an a priori pattern of relations among these 4 beliefs. In Study 1, exploratory factor analyses suggested relatively independent factors. This independence was sustained in Study 2, using a confirmatory analysis. Each of the 4 subscales (Free Will, Scientific Determinism, Fatalistic Determinism, and Unpredictability) showed acceptable internal consistencies. Study 2 also mapped out associations with the Big Five personality traits and showed that believing in free will is not synonymous with having an internal locus of control. Study 3 replicated the instrument's structure and subscale reliabilities in a community sample. Preliminary applications are described.

Belief in free will is associated with a conservative worldview, including such facets as authoritarianism, religiosity, punitiveness, and moralistic standards for judging self and others. The common element appears to be a strong sense of personal responsibility. Evidence for distinct correlates of scientific and fatalistic determinism reinforces the need for treating them separately.

Standard methods in experimental philosophy have sought to measure folk intuitions using experiments, but certain limitations are inherent in experimental methods. Accordingly, we have designed the Free-Will Intuitions Scale to empirically measure folk intuitions relevant to free-will debates using a different method. This method reveals what folk intuitions are like prior to participants' being put in forced-choice experiments. Our results suggest that a central debate in the experimental philosophy of free will-the "natural" compatibilism debate-is mistaken in assuming that folk intuitions are exclusively either compatibilist or incompatibilist. They also identify a number of important new issues in the empirical study of free-will intuitions.

Deficits in perspective-taking ability have been linked to social problems associated with disorders such as autism spectrum disorders (ASD) and conduct disorder. Even subtle deficits in perspective-taking are related to social adjustment and moral development. A common measure of perspective-taking abilities in children is the "Reading the Mind in the Eyes Task" ("Eyes task"; Baron-Cohen, Wheelwright, Spong, Scahill, & Lawson, 2001). The Eyes task was primarily developed for use in identifying individuals with ASDs, while its function with nonclinical populations has not been clearly addressed. Additionally, it is unknown whether the Eyes task can be used to measure specific deficits or abilities in the cognitive or emotional components of perspective-taking. In this article we assessed the structure and function of the Eyes task and an open ended or generative format of the same task (Generative Eyes Task; GET) found to measure emotional perspective-taking specifically. Confirmatory factor analyses found the traditional Eyes task to have the assumed single factor structure, while the GET has a clear 2-factor structure corresponding to emotionally valenced or neutral items. The Eyes task and the GET were also compared using item response theory. The Eyes task provided the most measurement accuracy at 2 standard deviations below the mean making it most accurate for populations with severe deficits, while the GET was most accurate at the mean level of perspective-taking. Based on these analyses, we conclude that the GET is more appropriate for use in nonclinical populations and when emotional perspective-taking abilities are of interest.

No abstract