Calculating the kinetics of motion using inverse or forward dynamics methods requires the use of accurate body segment inertial parameters. The methods available for calculating these body segment parameters (BSPs) have several limitations and a main concern is the applicability of predictive equations to several different populations. This study examined the differences in BSPs between 4 human populations using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), developed linear regression equations to predict mass, center of mass location (CM) and radius of gyration (K) in the frontal plane on 5 body segments and examined the errors produced by using several BSP sources in the literature. Significant population differences were seen in all segments for all populations and all BSPs except hand mass, indicating that population specific BSP predictors are needed. The linear regression equations developed performed best overall when compared to the other sources, yet no one set of predictors performed best for all segments, populations or BSPs. Large errors were seen with all models which were attributed to large individual differences within groups. Equations which account for these differences, including measurements of limb circumferences and breadths may provide better estimations. Geometric models use these parameters, however the models examined in this study did not perform well, possibly due to the assumption of constant density or the use of an overly simple shape. Creating solids which account for density changes or which mimic the mass distribution characteristics of the segment may solve this problem. Otherwise, regression equations specific for populations according to age, gender, race, and morphology may be required to provide accurate estimations of BSPs for use in kinetic equations of motion.
An increasing dependence of society on automobiles for both work and leisure and the corresponding increase in time spent seated in the car has been correlated with a greater risk of low back pain and absence from work (Porter and Gyi 2002). This study examined the effects of three types of lumbar massage units on seating comfort, muscle fatigue, muscle oxygenation, muscle blood flow and driving performance during a 1 h simulated driving task. Electromyographic (EMG) signals were recorded from the right and left thoracic and lumbar erector spinae musculature. Average EMG (AEMG), mean power frequency (MPF), gaps and amplitude probability distribution function (APDF) parameters were analysed from the three massage seats and compared to a control seat. Near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) and skin temperature from the right thoracic and lumbar erector spinae were used as an indication of muscle oxygenation and blood flow throughout the driving task. Ratings of perceived discomfort were used to assess driver discomfort, and driving performance was assessed by calculating mean lap times for the duration of each driving trial. The results showed statistically significant increases in skin temperature compared with the control seat after 60 min of driving. The NIRS results reflected these trends although the results were not statistically significant. AEMG and MPF measures showed no significant differences between the seats. MPF measures were found to increase over time, effects attributed to increases in muscle temperature. Gaps and APDF analyses revealed greater rest times and lower activation levels, respectively, with the control seat, which could result in increased loading of passive structures. This study demonstrated the beneficial effects of lumbar massage systems in increasing muscle blood flow and oxygenation. Although EMG parameters were not significantly different, the trends support the significant blood flow results. Future research should include longer driving times and adjustments in EMG measures to account for the effects of increasing muscle temperature on AEMG and MPF measures.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.