The performance of complex decision-making requires not only domain specific knowledge, but also a clear understanding of how to accurately make decisions. It is our belief that when training decision-making skills, feedback type will play an important role in increasing learning gains. In an attempt to understand this relationship, we investigated the effects of three types of feedback (process, outcome, and normative) on the task performance of college students within a complex, real time, computer based simulation. We collected data from 48 participants. Data analyses showed a statistically significant difference between groups. Specifically, the results revealed that participants who received process feedback outperformed participants who received normative feedback, outcome feedback, and a no feedback (control) condition. The implications of these results for optimal feedback delivery methods within scenario based training environments will be discussed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.