The research aims to better balance energy dissipation (ED) and self-centering capacities of posttensioning (PT) precast segmental ultra-high performance concrete bridge columns by adjusting common design parameters. A numerical model is established based on the equivalent plastic hinge model and validated by the cyclic loading test. The validated model is used to conduct a parametric study to investigate the effects of seven common design parameters on ED and self-centering capacities. The results show the proposed numerical model can accurately predict ED and self-centering capacities of the proposed bridge columns. The effect of the strength-yield ratio can be neglected when it is more than 1.2. The lower aspect ratio can first weaken and then improve the equivalent viscous damping ratio with drift ratio up, while the lower aspect ratio can reduce the residual drift ratio. With larger ED bar ratio, smaller unbonded length of ED bars and lower PT tendon ratio, the equivalent viscous damping ratio, and the residual drift ratio are significantly increased. It is not a perfect way to improve ED capacity by increasing the ED bar ratio, which can significantly magnify the residual drift ratio and limitedly enhance the equivalent viscous damping ratio, besides economical considering. Improving the gravity loading ratio and the initial PT stress are deemed to be effective ways to reduce the residual drift ratio because they not only have little influence on the equivalent viscous damping ratio but also result in no more costs.
K E Y W O R D Sbridge columns, numerical model, parametric analysis, precast segmental construction, self-centering, ultra-high performance concrete
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.