Background
DARS2 was overexpressed in multiple tumor types, but the biological role of DARS2 in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) have not been elucidated.
Methods
Firstly, the DARS2 expression in LUAD was explored using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Then, qRT‐PCR and Western blot were performed to confirm DARS2 expression in LUAD. Next, Cox regression and Kaplan–Meier methods were utilized to evaluate whether DARS2 expression can affect the overall survival. The relationships between DARS2 expression and clinicopathological characteristics were investigated by TCGA database. Moreover, we utilized Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) to detect DARS2‐related signaling pathways in LUAD. Finally, the special function of DARS2 in cell proliferation, invasion and apoptosis was assessed in vitro.
Results
The higher expression of DARS2 was found in LUAD compared to para‐carcinoma tissues and significantly related to tumor stage, T stage, and M stage. The survival analysis indicated that DARS2 overexpression was related to poor prognosis in LUAD. Multivariate analysis suggested that DARS2 expression was a prognostic indicator. GSEA revealed that DARS2 was primarily involved in cell cycle‐related pathways. In addition, upregulation of DARS2 facilitated LUAD cell proliferation, migration, invasion and inhabited apoptosis, DARS2 knockdown showed an opposite result.
Conclusion
DARS2 modulates the proliferation, invasion and apoptosis of LUAD cells, and sever as a promising therapeutic target for LUAD.
BackgroundCircular RNAs (circRNAs) play an important role in tumorigenesis and several circulating circRNA signatures are closely associated with tumor diagnosis. However, the expression and clinical significance of the two forms of circulating circRNAs, serum and serum exosomal, in patients with lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), have not been characterized.MethodsThree differentially expressed exosomal circRNAs, hsa_circ_0001492, hsa_circ_0001439, and hsa_circ_0000896, were selected based on previous exosomal circRNA sequencing data analyses of LUAD patients. The expression of these circRNAs in serum and serum-derived exosomes of LUAD patients was assessed using quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR), and correlations between circRNA expression and clinicopathological characteristics were analyzed. The reliability of serum and serum exosomal hsa_circ_0001492, hsa_circ_0001439, and hsa_circ_0000896 to diagnose LUAD was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.ResultsExpression of serum and serum exosomal hsa_circ_0001492, hsa_circ_0001439, and hsa_circ_0000896 were significantly higher in LUAD patients than in healthy donors, and significantly lower after surgery. These three serum exosomal circRNAs were also associated with a higher cancer stage. Exosomal hsa_circ_0001492 expression was positively correlated with carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) levels. An association between the expression of the three serum circRNAs and clinical characteristics was not observed. In addition, the three serum exosomal circRNAs had higher diagnostic sensitivity and specificity than the serum circRNAs, and the area under the curve (AUC) of all three serum exosomal circRNAs was >0.75. The combination of exosomal hsa_circ_0001492, hsa_circ_0001439, and hsa_circ_0000896 had better diagnostic sensitivity and specificity than that of a single marker, with an AUC value of 0.805.ConclusionsThe serum and serum exosomal circRNAs, hsa_circ_0001492, hsa_circ_0001439, and hsa_circ_0000896, were upregulated in LUAD patients. Serum exosomal circRNAs may serve as more effective biomarkers than serum circRNAs for LUAD diagnosis and may further aid the detection of this disease.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.