Myeloid cells and TLR4 play a critical role in acute kidney injury. This study investigated the regulatory role and mechanisms of myeloid TLR4 in experimental anti-glomerular basement membrane (GBM) glomerulonephritis (GN). Anti-GBM GN was induced in tlr4flox/flox and tlr4flox/flox−lysM−cre mice by intravenous injection of the sheep anti-mouse GBM antibody. Compared to control mice, conditional disruption of tlr4 from myeloid cells, largely macrophages (> 85%), suppressed glomerular crescent formation and attenuated progressive renal injury by lowering serum creatinine and 24-h urine protein excretion while improving creatinine clearance. Mechanistically, deletion of myeloid tlr4 markedly inhibited renal infiltration of macrophages and T cells and resulted in a shift of infiltrating macrophages from F4/80+iNOS+ M1 to F4/80+CD206+ M2 phenotype and inhibited the upregulation of renal proinflammatory cytokines IL-1β and MCP-1. Importantly, deletion of myeloid tlr4 suppressed T cell-mediated immune injury by shifting Th1 (CD4+IFNγ+) and Th17 (CD4+IL-17a+) to Treg (CD4+CD25+FoxP3+) immune responses. Transcriptome analysis also revealed that disrupted myeloid TLR4 largely downregulated genes involving immune and cytokine-related pathways. Thus, myeloid TLR4 plays a pivotal role in anti-GBM GN by immunological switching from M1 to M2 and from Th1/Th17 to Treg and targeting myeloid TLR4 may be a novel therapeutic strategy for immune-mediated kidney diseases.

No abstract

Allograft rejection is a common immunological feature in renal transplantation and is associated with reduced graft survival. A mouse renal allograft rejection model was induced and single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data of CD45+ leukocytes in kidney allografts on days 7 (D7) and 15 (D15) after operation was analyzed to reveal a full immunological profiling. We identified 20 immune cell types among 10,921 leukocytes. Macrophages and CD8+ T cells constituted the main populations on both timepoints. In the process from acute rejection (AR) towards chronic rejection (CR), the proportion of proliferating and naïve CD8+ T cells dropped significantly. Both B cells and neutrophils decreased by about 3 folds. On the contrary, the proportion of macrophages and dendritic cells (DCs) increased significantly, especially by about a 4.5-fold increase in Ly6cloMrc1+ macrophages and 2.6 folds increase in Ly6cloEar2+ macrophages. Moreover, myeloid cells harbored the richest ligand and receptor (LR) pairs with other cells, particularly for chemokine ligands such as Cxcl9, Cxcl10, Cxcl16 and Yars. However, macrophages with weak response to interferon gamma (IFNg) contributed to rejection chronicization. To conclude, reduction in CD8 T cells, B cells and neutrophils while increasing in Ly6cloMrc1+ macrophages and Ly6cloEar2+ macrophages, may contribute significantly to the progress from AR towards CR.

No abstract

Angiotensin‐converting enzyme‐2 (ACE2) and Mas receptor are the major components of the ACE2/Ang 1‐7/Mas axis and have been shown to play a protective role in hypertension and hypertensive nephropathy individually. However, the effects of dual deficiency of ACE2 and Mas (ACE2/Mas) on Ang II‐induced hypertensive nephropathy remain unexplored, which was investigated in this study in a mouse model of hypertension induced in either ACE2 knockout (KO) or Mas KO mice and in double ACE2/Mas KO mice by subcutaneously chronic infusion of Ang II. Compared with wild‐type (WT) animals, mice lacking either ACE2 or Mas significantly increased blood pressure over 7‐28 days following a chronic Ang II infusion (P < .001), which was further exacerbated in double ACE2/Mas KO mice (P < .001). Furthermore, compared to a single ACE2 or Mas KO mice, mice lacking ACE2/Mas developed more severe renal injury including higher levels of serum creatinine and a further reduction in creatinine clearance, and progressive renal inflammation and fibrosis. Mechanistically, worsen hypertensive nephropathy in double ACE2/Mas KO mice was associated with markedly enhanced AT1‐ERK1/2‐Smad3 and NF‐κB signalling, thereby promoting renal fibrosis and renal inflammation in the hypertensive kidney. In conclusion, ACE2 and Mas play an additive protective role in Ang II‐induced hypertension and hypertensive nephropathy. Thus, restoring the ACE2/Ang1‐7/Mas axis may represent a novel therapy for hypertension and hypertensive nephropathy.