ObjectiveWe sought to develop the first Damage Index (DI) in systemic sclerosis (SSc).MethodsThe conceptual definition of ‘damage’ in SSc was determined through consensus by a working group of the Scleroderma Clinical Trials Consortium (SCTC). Systematic literature review and consultation with patient partners and non-rheumatologist experts produced a list of potential items for inclusion in the DI. These steps were used to reduce the items: (1) Expert members of the SCTC (n=331) were invited to rate the appropriateness of each item for inclusion, using a web-based survey. Items with >60% consensus were retained; (2) Using a prospectively acquired Australian cohort data set of 1568 patients, the univariable relationships between the remaining items and the endpoints of mortality and morbidity (Physical Component Summary score of the Short Form 36) were analysed, and items with p<0.10 were retained; (3) using multivariable regression analysis, coefficients were used to determine a weighted score for each item. The DI was externally validated in a Canadian cohort.ResultsNinety-three (28.1%) complete survey responses were analysed; 58 of 83 items were retained. The univariable relationships with death and/or morbidity endpoints were statistically significant for 22 items, with one additional item forced into the multivariable model by experts due to clinical importance, to create a 23-item weighted SCTC DI (SCTC-DI). The SCTC-DI was predictive of morbidity and mortality in the external cohort.ConclusionsThrough the combined use of consensus and data-driven methods, a 23-item SCTC-DI was developed and retrospectively validated.

Despite calls for integrated palliative care, this occurs late or not at all for many patients with cancer. Our findings demonstrate the application of targeted cancer-specific transition points to trigger integration of palliative care as a standard part of quality oncological care and augment clinician-based referral in routine clinical practice.

This study reports the development of a scale-the Children's Stress Questionnaire (CSQ). It goes on to report the utility of the CSQ to assess the nature and level of stressor experience in a large sample of young and normal, primary school-age children, to document profiles of stressor experience in that age group, and to establish relationships between childhood stress and both current and future psychological dysfunction. Stressors grouped statistically into five related subscales, the largest of which reflected daily hassles beyond normal control. Repeat administrations of the CSQ 12 months apart confirmed the stability of the factor structure. Subscales demonstrated acceptable reliability, both internally and over time. In addition, subscale scores consistently related to negative (though not positive) mood at intake. More important, most subscale scores at intake statistically predicted depression three to four months and then 12 months later and anxiety at 24 months. The CSQ meets the stated need for an instrument capable of assessing stressor experience in unselected (nondysfunctional) young children and has demonstrated utility for further research on stress and health in this age group.

Background: There is a lack of studies examining the prevalence and severity of psychosocial distress in parents caring for a child with life-limiting condition. More research is also needed to better understand the experience, support needs and quality-of-life of this population. Aim: To describe the experience and support needs of caring for children with life-limiting conditions and examine the level of distress and quality-of-life experienced by parents. Design: Cross-sectional, prospective, quantitative study guided by an advisory group. Participants completed a survey that included demographics and self-report outcome measures of unmet support needs, appraisal of caregiving, psychological distress and quality-of-life. Bivariate correlation analyses were performed to examine for associations between measures. Setting/participants: Parents currently caring for one or more children (⩽18 years) with a life-limiting condition and registered with a paediatric palliative care service (Australia). Results: In total, 143 parents (88% female) completed the questionnaire (36% RR). Compared with population norms, participants reported low quality-of-life, high carer burden and high psychological distress. Almost half (47%) of the sample met the criteria for one or more diagnoses of clinically elevated stress, anxiety or depression. There were significant associations between the psychosocial outcome variables; carer strain and depression had the strongest correlations with quality-of-life ( r = –.63, p < .001, for both). Participants also reported multiple unmet needs related to emotional and practical support. Conclusions: This study contributes to the growing body of evidence on paediatric palliative care, specifically that parents caring for a child with a life-limiting condition report high levels of distress and burden, low quality-of-life and need more emotional and practical support targeted at their unmet needs. Paediatric palliative care services should routinely assess parent mental health and provide appropriate support.