Adult stem cells maintain tissue integrity and function by renewing cellular content of the organism through regulated mitotic divisions. Previous studies showed that stem cell activity is affected by local, systemic, and environmental cues. Here, we explore a role of environmental day-night cycles in modulating cell cycle progression in populations of adult stem cells. Using a classic stem cell system, the Drosophila spermatogonial stem cell niche, we reveal daily rhythms in division frequencies of germ-line and somatic stem cells that act cooperatively to produce male gametes. We also examine whether behavioral sleep-wake cycles, which are driven by the environmental day-night cycles, regulate stem cell function. We find that flies lacking the sleep-promoting factor Sleepless, which maintains normal sleep in Drosophila, have increased germ-line stem cell (GSC) division rates, and this effect is mediated, in part, through a GABAergic signaling pathway. We suggest that alterations in sleep can influence the daily dynamics of GSC divisions.

Background: Stent patency after carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) correlates not only with stroke prevention but also with improvements in cognition and quality of life by positively influencing cerebral perfusion. The long-term outcomes of CAS after more than 5 years have still not been well described. This retrospective study was designed to evaluate the stent patency and significant restenosis (SR) after CAS with more than 5 years of follow-up. Methods: Between 2006 and 2012, 118 patients with carotid stenosis who underwent 131 CAS procedures with regular annual imaging follow-up for more than 5 years were enrolled. We evaluated their demographic characteristics and the risk factors related to stent restenosis. Patients with SR (restenosis ≥ 50%) were compared with those with no significant restenosis (NSR, patency or restenosis < 50%) to identify the restenosis predictors and restenosis-free survival. Results: Of the 131 CAS procedures, 16.0% (21/131) had SR. A history of head and neck radiotherapy (HNRT) was a predictor for SR (HR, 6.352; 95% CI, 2.504–16.112; p < 0.001) and was associated with shorter restenosis-free survival (log-rank test p value < 0.001, median time of restenosis-free survival was 38 months). Left-sided stenting was an associated factor for SR (HR, 3.007; 95% CI, 1.068–8.467; p = 0.037) with a trend of less restenosis-free survival (log-rank test p value 0.067). Conclusion: Both HNRT and left-sided carotid stenosis were predictors of SR after CAS in more than 5 years of long-term follow-up. Restenosis-free survival was significantly shorter in patients with prior HNRT than in patients without previous irradiation treatment. We suggest close follow-up and aggressive medical treatment for patients with prior HNRT and left-sided carotid stenosis undergoing CAS.