Laparoscopic LLN dissection based on VF and UNF is feasible, with acceptable surgical and oncological outcomes.

Introduction: Splenic hilar lymph node dissection via a splenectomy for advanced proximal gastric cancer remains controversial. Recently, a laparoscopic spleen-preserving hilar lymph node dissection procedure was described in several publications. To assess the feasibility and safety of spleen-preserving laparoscopic total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy (LTG-D2), the present retrospective study compared the short-term surgical outcomes between spleen preservation and splenectomy during laparoscopic D2 total gastrectomy (LTG-D2S).Method: This study included 59 patients who underwent LTG-D2 and 19 patients who underwent LTG-D2S. Results: The mean operation time did not significantly differ between the LTG-D2 and LTG-D2S groups (339.4 ± 56.8 vs 356.8 ± 46.0 min). The mean blood loss tended to be smaller in the LTG-D2 group than in the LTG-D2S group (105.9 ± 89.7 vs 210.0 ± 149.5 mL). The mean number of retrieved lymph nodes did not significantly differ between the LTG-D2 and LTG-D2S groups (39.9 ± 17.0 vs 40.6 ± 14.9), and the mean number of retrieved lymph nodes at the splenic hilum also did not significantly differ between the LTG-D2 and LTG-D2S groups (1.3 ± 1.7 vs 2.4 ± 2.6). Mild pancreatic fistula occurred in three cases (5%) in the LTG-D2 group and in three cases (15.8%) in the LTG-D2S group. Conclusion: A LTG-D2 is feasible in terms of the short-term outcomes. However, the indications for this complicated procedure should be considered carefully.

Background Traumatic esophageal injury leads to severe complications such as mediastinitis, pyothorax, and tracheoesophageal fistula. Although prompt diagnosis and treatment are required, there are no established protocols to guide diagnosis or treatment. In particular, thoracic esophageal injury tends to be diagnosed later than cervical esophageal injury because it has few specific symptoms. We report a case of thoracic esophageal injury caused by a cervical stab wound; the patient was stabbed with a sharp blade. Case presentation A 74-year-old woman was attacked with a knife while sleeping at home. The patient was taken to the emergency room with an injury localized to the left section of her neck. She was suspected of a left jugular vein and recurrent laryngeal nerve injury from cervical hematoma and hoarseness. On the day following the injury, computed tomography revealed a thoracic esophageal injury. Emergency surgery was performed for an esophageal perforation and mediastinal abscesses. Although delayed diagnosis resulted in suture failure, the patient was able to resume oral intake of food a month later following enteral feeding with a gastrostomy. Esophageal injuries due to sharp trauma are rare, and most are cervical esophageal injuries. There are very few reports on thoracic esophageal injuries. Conclusions The possibility of thoracic esophageal injury should always be considered when dealing with neck stab wounds, particularly those caused by an attack.

Laparoscopic lower rectal surgery using the RC with a CF is feasible and provides acceptable surgical and oncological outcomes.

In our experience, the simple Rectum Catcher device is safe and useful for performing laparoscopic assisted high and lower rectal surgery.