BackgroundGrowth-promoting endophytes have great potential to boost crop production and sustainability. There is, however, a lack of research on how differences in the plant host affect an endophyte’s ability to promote growth. We set out to quantify how different maize genotypes respond to specific growth-promoting endophytes. We inoculated genetically diverse maize lines with three different known beneficial endophytes: Herbaspirillum seropedicae (a gram-negative bacteria), Burkholderia WP9 (a gram-negative bacteria), and Serendipita vermifera Subsp. bescii (a Basidiomycota fungus). Maize seedlings were grown for 3 weeks under controlled conditions in the greenhouse and assessed for various growth promotion phenotypes.ResultsWe found Herbaspirillum seropedicae to increase chlorophyll content, plant height, root length, and root volume significantly in different maize genotypes, while Burkholderia WP9 did not significantly promote growth in any lines under these conditions. Serendipita bescii significantly increased root and shoot mass for 4 maize genotypes, and growth promotion correlated with measured fungal abundance. Although plant genetic variation by itself had a strong effect on phenotype, its interaction with the different endophytes was weak, and the endophytes rarely produced consistent effects across different genotypes.ConclusionsThis genome-by-genome interaction indicates that the relationship between a plant host and beneficial endophytes is complex, and it may partly explain why many microbe-based growth stimulants fail to translate from laboratory settings to the field. Detangling these interactions will provide a ripe area for future studies to understand how to best harness beneficial endophytes for agriculture.

Growth-promoting endophytes have great potential to boost crop production and sustainability. There is, however, a lack of research on how differences in the plant host affect an endophyte’s ability to promote growth. We set out to quantify how different maize genotypes respond to specific growth-promoting endophytes. We inoculated genetically diverse maize lines with three different known beneficial endophytes: Herbaspirillum seropedicae (a Gram-negative bacteria), Burkholderia WP9 (a Gram-negative bacteria), and Serendipita vermifera Subsp. bescii (a Basidiomycota fungi). Maize seedlings were grown for 3 weeks under controlled watering and limited nutrient conditions in the greenhouse and assessed for various growth-promotion phenotypes. We found Herbaspirillum seropedicae to increase chlorophyll content (p = 0.02), plant height (p = 0.012), root length (p = 0.057), and root volume (p = 0.044) significantly in different maize genotypes, while Burkholderia WP9 did not promote growth in maize genotypes under these conditions. Serendipita bescii significantly increased plant height (p = 0.0041), root (p = 0.0004) and shoot biomass (p = 0.0046) for different maize genotypes, and shoot mass growth promotion correlated (r = 0.58, p = 1.97e−09) with measured fungal abundance. Although plant genetic variation by itself had a strong effect on phenotype, its interaction with the different endophytes was weak, and the endophytes rarely produced consistent effects across different genotypes. This genome-by-genome interaction indicates that the relationship between a plant host and beneficial endophytes is complex, and it may partly explain why many microbe-based growth stimulants fail to translate from laboratory settings to the field. Detangling these interactions will provide a ripe area for future studies to understand how to best harness beneficial endophytes for agriculture.