BackgroundGrowth-promoting endophytes have great potential to boost crop production and sustainability. There is, however, a lack of research on how differences in the plant host affect an endophyte’s ability to promote growth. We set out to quantify how different maize genotypes respond to specific growth-promoting endophytes. We inoculated genetically diverse maize lines with three different known beneficial endophytes: Herbaspirillum seropedicae (a gram-negative bacteria), Burkholderia WP9 (a gram-negative bacteria), and Serendipita vermifera Subsp. bescii (a Basidiomycota fungus). Maize seedlings were grown for 3 weeks under controlled conditions in the greenhouse and assessed for various growth promotion phenotypes.ResultsWe found Herbaspirillum seropedicae to increase chlorophyll content, plant height, root length, and root volume significantly in different maize genotypes, while Burkholderia WP9 did not significantly promote growth in any lines under these conditions. Serendipita bescii significantly increased root and shoot mass for 4 maize genotypes, and growth promotion correlated with measured fungal abundance. Although plant genetic variation by itself had a strong effect on phenotype, its interaction with the different endophytes was weak, and the endophytes rarely produced consistent effects across different genotypes.ConclusionsThis genome-by-genome interaction indicates that the relationship between a plant host and beneficial endophytes is complex, and it may partly explain why many microbe-based growth stimulants fail to translate from laboratory settings to the field. Detangling these interactions will provide a ripe area for future studies to understand how to best harness beneficial endophytes for agriculture.

Growth-promoting endophytes have great potential to boost crop production and sustainability. There is, however, a lack of research on how differences in the plant host affect an endophyte’s ability to promote growth. We set out to quantify how different maize genotypes respond to specific growth-promoting endophytes. We inoculated genetically diverse maize lines with three different known beneficial endophytes: Herbaspirillum seropedicae (a Gram-negative bacteria), Burkholderia WP9 (a Gram-negative bacteria), and Serendipita vermifera Subsp. bescii (a Basidiomycota fungi). Maize seedlings were grown for 3 weeks under controlled watering and limited nutrient conditions in the greenhouse and assessed for various growth-promotion phenotypes. We found Herbaspirillum seropedicae to increase chlorophyll content (p = 0.02), plant height (p = 0.012), root length (p = 0.057), and root volume (p = 0.044) significantly in different maize genotypes, while Burkholderia WP9 did not promote growth in maize genotypes under these conditions. Serendipita bescii significantly increased plant height (p = 0.0041), root (p = 0.0004) and shoot biomass (p = 0.0046) for different maize genotypes, and shoot mass growth promotion correlated (r = 0.58, p = 1.97e−09) with measured fungal abundance. Although plant genetic variation by itself had a strong effect on phenotype, its interaction with the different endophytes was weak, and the endophytes rarely produced consistent effects across different genotypes. This genome-by-genome interaction indicates that the relationship between a plant host and beneficial endophytes is complex, and it may partly explain why many microbe-based growth stimulants fail to translate from laboratory settings to the field. Detangling these interactions will provide a ripe area for future studies to understand how to best harness beneficial endophytes for agriculture.

Heterosis, also known as hybrid vigor, is the basis of modern maize production. The effect of heterosis on maize phenotypes has been studied for decades, but its effect on the maize-associated microbiome is much less characterized. To determine the effect of heterosis on the maize microbiome, we sequenced and compared the bacterial communities of inbred, open pollinated, and hybrid maize. Samples covered three tissue types (Stalk, Root, and Rhizosphere) in two field experiments and one greenhouse experiment. Bacterial diversity was affected by location and tissue type, but not genetic background, for both within-sample (alpha) and between-sample (beta) diversity. PERMANOVA analysis similarly showed that tissue type and location had significant effects on the overall community structure, whereas the genetic background and individual plant genotypes did not. Differential abundance analysis identified only 18 bacterial ASVs that significantly differed between inbred and hybrid maize. Predicted metagenome content was inferred with Picrust2, and it also showed a significantly larger effect of tissue and location than genetic background. Overall, these results indicate that the bacterial communities of inbred and hybrid maize are often more similar than they are different, and that non-genetic effects are generally the largest influences on the maize microbiome.

The maize microbiome consists of microbes that are associated with plants, and can be shaped by the host plant, the environment, and microbial partners, some of which can impact plant performance. We used a public dataset to analyze bacteria and fungi in the soil, rhizosphere, roots, and leaves of commercial maize at 30 locations across the US. We found that both tissue type and location had significant effects on community structure and makeup, although the patterns differed in bacteria and fungi based on tissue type. We also found many differences in predicted microbial gene pathways between tissues, with location also shaping predicted functional gene profiles. We found a pattern of potential interaction between fungi and bacteria, and potential intra-kingdom mutualism, in microbiome networks. The robustness of these networks was dependent upon tissue, with endophytes in leaves and roots showing significantly higher natural connectivity. Within a tissue, this connectivity was relatively stable across locations. We identified environment and soil characteristics that may impact tissue specific microbial abundance. Sulfate level in the soil was positively correlated with Proteobacteria abundance, but negatively correlated with Firmicutes abundance in the roots and leafs. Ascomycota appears to be affected by different environmental variables in each tissue. We also identified gene functions and enzymes which may be necessary to allow microbes to transition across compartments and become endophytes.

Heterosis, also known as hybrid vigor, is the basis of modern maize production. The effect of heterosis on maize phenotypes has been studied for decades, but its effect on the maize-associated microbiome is much less characterized. To determine the effect of heterosis on the maize microbiome, we sequenced and compared the bacterial communities of inbred, open pollinated, and hybrid maize. Samples covered three tissue types (stalk, root, and rhizosphere) in two field experiments and one greenhouse experiment. Bacterial diversity was more affected by location and tissue type than genetic background for both within-sample (alpha) and between-sample (beta) diversity. PERMANOVA analysis similarly showed that tissue type and location had significant effects on the overall community structure, whereas the intraspecies genetic background and individual plant genotypes did not. Differential abundance analysis identified only 25 bacterial ASVs that significantly differed between inbred and hybrid maize. Predicted metagenome content was inferred with Picrust2, and it also showed a significantly larger effect of tissue and location than genetic background. Overall, these results indicate that the bacterial communities of inbred and hybrid maize are often more similar than they are different and that non-genetic effects are generally the largest influences on the maize microbiome.