Polemik penyelesaian sengketa pertanahan di Indonesia menjadi permasalahan serius. Banyaknya jalur penyelesaian sengketa pertanahan mengakibatkan kerap terjadinya putusan yang tumpang tindih, lamanya proses pengadilan yang tidak mengedepankan asas sederhana, cepat, dan biaya ringan dalam penyelesaian sengketa, serta hakim yang masih belum optimal dalam penyelesaian sengketa pertanahan karena hanya mendasarkan pada kebenaran formil daripada kebenaran materiil dalam penyelesaian sengketa pertanahan. Artikel ini mencoba untuk mengkaji pengadilan agraria sebagai upaya penyelesaian sengketa pertanahan yang lebih optimal. Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif melalui pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan, kasus, dan perbandingan negara di Australia khususnya di Queensland dan New South Wales serta negara Skotlandia, artikel ini akan menawarkan gagasan pembentukan pengadilan agraria. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pengadilan agraria di Queensland, New South Wales, dan Skotlandia mampu menjadi media penyelesaian sengketa pertanahan yang optimal. Gagasan pengadilan agraria sejatinya telah tertuang dalam Pasal 60, 61, dan 82 RUU Pertanahan dengan menempatkan pengadilan agraria di bawah pengadilan umum dan menggunakan hukum acara perdata. Melihat hal tersebut, perlu adanya upaya untuk merekonseptualisasi pengadilan agraria dengan menempatkan pengadilan agraria di bawah Mahkamah Agung, melakukan revisi RUU Pertanahan, dan membentuk Hukum Acara Pertanahan. Selain itu, perlu adanya penguatan mekanisme rekrutmen hakim khususnya pada hakim pengadilan agraria.

Currently, the issue of freedom of expression poses a significant challenge in Indonesia. Despite being a democratic nation, the scope of people's freedom of expression is largely confined to electoral processes. In order to advance this fundamental right, the implementation of an electronic petition system has been undertaken as a means to facilitate the exercise of freedom of expression. The primary objective of this research is to examine the status quo of freedom of expression in Indonesia and to analyze the pressing need for the adoption of an electronic petition system. This study employs a normative legal approach and conducts comparative analysis with the United Kingdom and Germany, utilizing secondary data sources. The findings of this research demonstrate that Indonesia would greatly benefit from the adoption of an e-democracy system through the implementation of an electronic petition system. The efficacy of such a system has been successfully demonstrated in the United Kingdom and Germany, where it has served as an effective intermediary between the public and the government, ensuring sustained public participation and influencing governmental decision-making processes. In order to implement the electronic petition system in Indonesia, several crucial steps must be undertaken. These steps include the establishment of a Petition Committee, the formulation of Petition Laws, and the official recognition of a dedicated website serving as the electronic petition platform in Indonesia. Additionally, political will and legislative enforcement will be required to ensure the Indonesian Parliament's commitment to act upon the outcomes of these petitions.

The Omnibus Law is often discussed and debated, especially in its implementation in Indonesia. Omnibus Law is considered as a solution to make legislation more efficient, Omnibus Law is something new in the formation of legislation in Indonesia. Previously, the Omnibus Law was often used in the common law legal system, and several civil law countries have also implemented the Omnibus Law. In this study, the authors examine the United States and the Philippines. The concept of the Omnibus Law is not only used for one type of law but has penetrated into other sectoral laws. In the Philippines, since 2003 the Omnibus Law has been enacted as a method for forming legislation. It is different from the United States, which has implemented the Omnibus Law since 1850. This research refers to a comparison of the Omnibus Law in the Philippines because the Philippines is a country in the Southeast Asia region just like Indonesia and adheres to a legal system that combines common law and civil law which does not very different from Indonesia, further comparison with the United States Omnibus Law, because the United States is also one of the countries that is the mecca of world law. This study uses normative legal research, using secondary data which is processed using qualitative techniques. This study uses a comparison of two countries which makes this research different from other research related to the Omnibus Law, with the aim of examining the position of the Omnibus Law in Indonesia and making comparisons with the United States and the Philippines.

No abstract