IntroductionAnterior-gradient 2 (AGR2) is an estrogen-responsive secreted protein. Its upregulation has been well documented in a number of cancers, particularly breast cancer, for which mixed data exist on the prognostic implications of AGR2 expression. Although emerging evidence indicates that AGR2 is associated with poor prognosis, its function and impact on cancer-relevant pathways have not been elucidated in breast cancer.MethodsTo investigate the biologic role of AGR2 in breast cancer, AGR2 was transiently knocked down, by using siRNA, in T47 D and ZR-75-1 (estrogen receptor-α (ER)-positive) and MDA-MB-231 and SK-BR-3 (ER-negative) human breast cancer cell lines. The impact of silencing AGR2 was evaluated in both anchorage-dependent and anchorage-independent growth (soft agar, spheroid) assays. Cell-cycle profiles in ER-positive cell lines were determined with BrdU incorporation, and cell death was measured with Annexin V, JC-1, and F7-26 staining. After transiently silencing AGR2 or stimulating with recombinant AGR2, modulation of key regulators of growth and survival pathways was assessed with Western blot. Combination studies of AGR2 knockdown with the antiestrogens tamoxifen and fulvestrant were carried out and assessed at the level of anchorage-dependent growth inhibition and target modulation (cyclin D1, ER).ResultsAGR2 knockdown inhibited growth in anchorage-dependent and anchorage-independent assays, with a more-pronounced effect in ER-positive cell lines. Cyclin D1 levels and BrdU incorporation were reduced with AGR2 knockdown. Conversely, cyclin D1 was induced with recombinant AGR2. AGR2 knockdown induced cell death in ZR-75-1 and T47 D cells, and also downregulated survivin and c-Myc. Evidence of AGR2-ER crosstalk was demonstrated by a reduction of ER at the protein level after transiently silencing AGR2. AGR2 knockdown in combination with fulvestrant or tamoxifen did not preclude the efficacy of the antiestrogens, but enhanced it. In addition, p-Src, implicated in tamoxifen resistance, was downregulated with AGR2 knockdown.ConclusionsTransiently silencing AGR2 in ER-positive breast cancer cell lines inhibited cell growth and cell-cycle progression and induced cell death. Breast cancer drivers (ER and cyclin D1) as well as cancer-signaling nodes (pSrc, c-Myc, and survivin) were demonstrated to be downstream of AGR2. Collectively, the data presented support the utility of anti-AGR2 therapy in ER-positive breast cancers because of its impact on cancer-relevant pathways.
Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 kinase insert domain receptor (VEGFR2/KDR) is critical for angiogenesis, and VEGFR2 mRNA and protein are expressed in ZR-75 breast cancer cells and induced by 17beta-estradiol (E2). Deletion analysis of the VEGFR2 promoter indicates that the proximal GC-rich region is required for both basal and hormone-induced transactivation, and mutation of one or both of the GC-rich motifs at -58 and -44 results in loss of transactivation. Electrophoretic mobility shift and chromatin immunoprecipitation assays show that Sp1, Sp3, and Sp4 proteins bind the GC-rich region of the VEGFR2 promoter. Results of the chromatin immunoprecipitation assay also demonstrate that ERalpha is constitutively bound to the VEGFR2 promoter and that these interactions are not enhanced after treatment with E2, whereas ERalpha binding to the region of the pS2 promoter containing an estrogen-responsive element is enhanced by E2. RNA interference studies show that hormone-induced activation of the VEGFR2 promoter constructs requires Sp3 and Sp4 but not Sp1, demonstrating that hormonal activation of VEGFR2 involves a nonclassical mechanism in which ERalpha/Sp3 and ERalpha/Sp4 complexes activate GC-rich sites where Sp proteins but not ERalpha bind DNA. These results show for the first time that Sp3 and Sp4 cooperatively interact with ERalpha to activate VEGFR2 and are in contrast to previous results showing that several hormone-responsive genes are activated by ERalpha/Sp1 in breast cancer cell lines.
17beta-Estradiol (E2) induces and represses gene expression in breast cancer cells; however, the mechanisms of gene repression are not well understood. In this study, we show that E2 decreases vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2) mRNA levels in MCF-7 cells, and this gene was used as a model for investigating pathways associated with E2-dependent gene repression. Deletion analysis of the VEGFR2 promoter indicates that the proximal GC-rich motifs at -58 and -44 are critical for the E2-dependent decreased response in MCF-7 cells. Mutation or deletion of these GC-rich elements results in loss of hormone responsiveness and shows that the -60 to -37 region of the VEGFR2 promoter is critical for both basal and hormone-dependent decreased VEGFR2 expression in MCF-7 cells. Western blot, immunofluorescent staining, RNA interference, and EMSAs support a role for Sp proteins in hormone-dependent down-regulation of VEGFR2 in MCF-7 cells, primarily through estrogen receptor (ER)alpha/Sp1 and ERalpha/Sp3 interactions with the VEGFR2 promoter. Using chromatin immuno-precipitation and transient transfection/RNA interference assays we show that the ERalpha/Sp protein-promoter interactions are accompanied by recruitment of the co-repressors SMRT (silencing mediator of retinoid and thyroid hormone receptor) and NCoR (nuclear receptor corepressor) to the promoter and that SMRT and NCoR knockdown reverse E2-mediated down-regulation of VEGFR2 expression in MCF-7 cells. This study illustrates that both SMRT and NCoR are involved in E2-dependent repression of VEGFR2 in MCF-7 cells.
Introduction 1,1-Bis (3'-indolyl)-1-(p-biphenyl) methane (CDIM9) has been identified as a new peroxisome proliferatoractivated receptor (PPAR)-γ agonist that exhibits both receptor dependent and independent antitumor activities. CDIM9 has not previously been studied with respect to its effects against basallike breast cancer. Our goal in the present study was to investigate the anti-basal-like breast tumor activity of CDIM9 in vitro and in vivo.
Regenerating islet‐derived family member, 4 (Reg IV) is a secreted protein and member of the C‐type lectin superfamily. Expression analyses have characterized Reg IV as a prognostic marker for certain cancers; however, the functional role of Reg IV in cancer, including downstream signaling, has only begun to be elucidated. To investigate the biological role of Reg IV in cancer, phosphorylation events were studied in cancer cell lines in the context of either Reg IV stimulation (HCT116 cells) or knockdown of endogenous Reg IV (PC3 and KM12 cells). In addition to the previously observed impact on epidermal growth factor receptor and Akt phosphorylation, we observed modulation in the phosphorylation of multiple additional receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), including insulin receptor, insulin‐like growth factor receptor as well as their downstream effectors, mitogen‐activated protein kinase and phosphatidylinositol‐3‐kinase pathways. Furthermore, knockdown of Reg IV impacted the ability of insulin and EGF to stimulate downstream tyrosine phosphorylation. Knockdown of Reg IV in cancer cell lines inhibited anchorage‐dependent and anchorage‐independent (both soft‐agar and spheroid assays) cell growth and induced cell cycle arrest. This was accompanied by upregulation of p21 and p27. Transiently silencing Reg IV in cancer cells induced apoptosis and downregulated Bcl‐2. Conversely, stimulation of HCT116 cells with recombinant Reg IV induced Bcl‐2. Hsp27, a molecule implicated in drug resistance, was similarly modulated by Reg IV. Consistent with our observations with Reg IV siRNA‐mediated knockdown, monoclonal antibodies directed against Reg IV inhibited PC3 and KM12 cell growth. Collectively, Reg IV plays an important role in cancer by modulation of key signaling molecules including Hsp27, Bcl‐2 and multiple RTKs.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.